H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jeff Tarango vs Diego Perez H2H: 1-1
Jeff Tarango and Diego Perez are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Jeff Tarango won the 1993 Tampa third round 0-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 57
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
URU
Age 64
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 1993* | Tampa | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jeff Tarango | 0-6 6-2 6-2 | Diego Perez | Match data |
| May 9, 1991* | Charlotte | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Diego Perez | 6-4 6-2 | Jeff Tarango | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeff Tarango | #1,001 | #42 | 877 | 1,787 | 239 | 293 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Diego Perez | #1,373 | #27 | 389 | 1,830 | 195 | 213 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jeff Tarango | Diego Perez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #377 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #96 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #94 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #100 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #131 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #106 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #52 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #45 | 1,694 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #55 | 1,779 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1993 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #61 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #78 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #116 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1995 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #142 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1996 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #106 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #112 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1997 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #132 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1998 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #73 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #176 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1999 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #55 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #128 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2000 | 10–24 | 29.4% | #112 | 1,515 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #253 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #323 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #661 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #730 | 1,446 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |