H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jeff Tarango vs George Bastl H2H: 0-1

George Bastl holds a 1–0 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, George Bastl leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, George Bastl won the 2000 Shanghai Masters round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
George Bastl
SUI Age 51 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
George Bastl #93 6-4 6-4 Jeff Tarango #81 Match data Oct 19, 2000* R32 Shanghai Masters ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,788 240 294 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
George Bastl #953 #71 569 1,656 47 85 35.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jeff Tarango George Bastl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,607 0 0 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,495 0 0
22 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2 1998 1–3 25.0% #194 1,501 0 0
24 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2 1999 6–7 46.2% #81 1,558 0 0
25 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,655 0 2 2000 15–22 40.5% #105 1,611 0 0
26 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,654 0 2 2001 10–15 40.0% #115 1,622 0 0
27 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,619 0 2 2002 3–9 25.0% #160 1,564 0 0
28 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,693 0 2 2003 0–3 0.0% #277 1,499 0 0
29 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2 2004 0–1 0.0% #201 1,490 0 0
30 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2 2005 4–7 36.4% #128 1,564 0 0
31 2000 11–25 30.6% #112 1,517 0 2 2006 5–8 38.5% #173 1,588 0 0
32 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2 2007 1–4 20.0% #464 1,522 0 0
33 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,447 0 2 2008 1–4 20.0% #233 1,619 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2009 1–1 50.0% #523 1,473 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jeff Tarango George Bastl
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1988 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1991 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1992 17 11 28 60.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 1993 14 16 30 46.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1999 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1994 18 18 36 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2000 11 13 24 45.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 1995 7 14 21 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 2001 8 9 17 47.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 1996 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 2002 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1997 20 13 33 60.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 1998 19 18 37 51.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2004 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 1999 6 11 17 35.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2005 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2000 2 14 16 12.5% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2006 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2001 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 146 167 313 46.6% 49 59 108 45.4% 14 27 41 34.1% 31 41 72 43.1% — 37 51 88 42.0% 2 12 14 14.3% 3 13 16 18.8% 5 9 14 35.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 411/468 of Jeff Tarango's and 122/132 of George Bastl's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jeff Tarango George Bastl
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 1/1 4.0 2.0 65.0% 67.3% 53.6% 50.0% 33.3% 62.5% 26.9%
22 1991 32/39 1.9 5.1 65.8% 64.8% 46.6% 56.0% 48.7% 58.5% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1992 47/52 3.5 3.5 63.1% 67.5% 47.8% 56.6% 42.3% 60.3% 38.7% 1998 3/4 4.0 3.3 72.6% 63.1% 43.7% 47.1% 30.0% 57.6% 33.1%
24 1993 43/50 3.7 4.6 56.6% 68.4% 47.0% 59.2% 45.1% 59.1% 38.5% 1999 11/13 5.1 3.2 63.5% 68.4% 48.1% 57.2% 41.1% 61.1% 37.7%
25 1994 40/50 3.6 2.2 62.1% 65.8% 51.8% 56.4% 46.6% 60.6% 39.0% 2000 32/37 3.8 2.8 66.2% 63.9% 48.5% 58.5% 37.4% 58.6% 39.3%
26 1995 38/42 4.2 3.7 62.9% 70.3% 49.3% 54.4% 44.8% 62.3% 37.0% 2001 23/25 6.3 1.9 69.0% 64.5% 49.6% 50.3% 44.1% 60.2% 38.5%
27 1996 28/32 5.2 3.2 61.9% 68.0% 50.2% 54.3% 39.3% 61.4% 38.0% 2002 12/12 5.8 5.0 62.9% 67.2% 44.2% 58.8% 27.8% 58.5% 32.7%
28 1997 54/60 3.8 3.5 62.3% 69.2% 51.5% 52.2% 45.0% 62.3% 38.9% 2003 3/3 1.0 1.7 67.6% 64.9% 46.2% 47.8% 33.3% 59.0% 26.5%
29 1998 47/53 4.0 4.2 57.7% 67.9% 52.0% 51.3% 46.8% 61.1% 40.1% 2004 1/1 8.0 2.0 69.4% 71.2% 42.3% 71.4% 50.0% 62.4% 31.9%
30 1999 42/45 4.9 4.1 60.6% 67.1% 46.1% 61.0% 43.2% 58.9% 38.4% 2005 11/11 5.9 3.0 59.7% 62.9% 47.8% 59.8% 46.0% 58.4% 36.6%
31 2000 33/36 4.6 5.3 58.1% 68.9% 47.5% 56.9% 42.2% 60.1% 36.0% 2006 13/13 6.9 3.5 57.3% 71.7% 44.5% 56.0% 30.4% 60.1% 34.1%
32 2001 7/9 3.3 2.1 62.4% 61.8% 52.7% 53.7% 51.2% 58.4% 34.3% 2007 5/5 6.0 3.0 65.7% 71.4% 40.6% 51.0% 15.5% 60.7% 33.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 5/5 5.8 2.6 63.6% 65.8% 50.9% 58.0% 31.2% 60.6% 29.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/2 5.5 4.5 52.3% 69.4% 41.4% 31.0% 49.1% 56.0% 42.4%
Career — 411/534 3.9 3.9 61.0% 67.8% 49.2% 55.7% 44.6% 60.5% 38.2% — 122/132 5.3 3.0 64.5% 66.1% 47.2% 55.4% 36.9% 59.4% 36.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jeff Tarango George Bastl
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1987 1508 108.5 — — — — +34 — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1988 1598 124.9 — — — — +37 — — 51.4% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 1648 118.8 — — — — +7 — -102 46.4% -0.39 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1990 1607 120.5 — — — — +6 -46 -69 42.0% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.35 1996 1495 106.7 -1.02 +6.41 0.716 46.3% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.15
22 1991 1613 132.3 -1.93 -1.26 0.892 48.2% +24 -37 — 41.8% -0.47 8–7 (53%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1992 1694 139.2 -0.84 +0.16 0.974 49.7% +28 -96 -139 50.4% +0.10 15–6 (71%) 10–14 (42%) — -1.21 1998 1502 110.8 -1.46 +0.40 0.781 46.0% — — — 30.0% -0.90 1–1 1–0 — -0.32
24 1993 1670 136.1 -1.01 -0.06 0.942 49.0% +18 -8 — 45.9% -0.28 12–6 (67%) 2–6 (25%) — -1.60 1999 1559 129.2 -0.33 +1.04 0.969 49.6% +50 — — 50.0% -0.03 0–2 3–2 (60%) — +0.94
25 1994 1655 132.9 -1.13 +0.92 0.992 50.0% +24 -22 — 46.1% -0.03 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.47 2000 1611 132.3 -2.50 +1.37 0.949 49.0% +51 -110 -122 40.7% -0.52 6–4 (60%) 3–9 (25%) — -0.59
26 1995 1654 144.2 +0.56 -0.03 0.982 49.5% +7 -14 -104 43.3% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.34 2001 1622 126.7 -1.08 +0.30 0.967 49.3% +92 -173 — 41.7% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 8–6 (57%) — -0.23
27 1996 1620 125.4 -0.16 +0.21 0.984 49.7% +74 -59 — 44.4% -0.35 4–7 (36%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.93 2002 1564 112.2 -2.22 -2.35 0.786 45.8% +54 — -26 31.3% -1.19 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.20
28 1997 1694 143.8 +0.74 +1.18 1.031 50.6% +30 -59 -135 52.9% +0.29 7–11 (39%) 11–12 (48%) — -1.45 2003 1500 93.7 -3.02 +0.52 0.647 43.0% — — — 0.0% -2.83 — — — +0.05
29 1998 1660 141.3 -0.44 +2.15 1.031 50.5% +49 -71 -90 47.8% -0.04 7–14 (33%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.03 2004 1491 102.5 -1.47 +0.15 0.847 48.7% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.12
30 1999 1685 132.2 -2.40 -0.03 0.934 48.9% +15 -75 -110 46.4% -0.07 7–6 (54%) 6–6 (50%) — +1.16 2005 1564 113.3 -2.00 -0.81 0.880 47.3% +41 — — 37.0% -0.96 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.35
31 2000 1517 123.9 -0.88 -1.79 0.903 48.4% -8 +82 +47 38.3% -0.57 3–10 (23%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.28 2006 1589 118.6 -2.70 -0.72 0.853 47.5% +30 — -49 35.7% -0.89 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.07
32 2001 1453 110.6 -0.42 -1.74 0.824 46.7% +20 — — 25.0% -1.60 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.01 2007 1523 107.1 -2.47 -1.23 0.863 47.0% +43 — — 30.8% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.26
33 2002 1447 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.06 2008 1619 114.2 -0.33 -1.38 0.737 45.5% +36 — — 25.0% -1.42 1–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.03
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1473 105.8 -1.01 +0.84 0.965 48.7% — — — 60.0% -0.20 0–1 — — -0.06
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1426 93.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1402 95.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1386 94.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1375 96.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2009 1455 101.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1788 140.0 -0.70 +0.24 0.968 49.5% +26 -27 -95 45.8% -0.19 84–94 (47%) 79–102 (44%) 95.5 -0.38 — 1656 119.8 -1.84 +0.11 0.895 48.0% +55 -135 -62 37.8% -0.72 16–22 (42%) 22–31 (42%) 95.6 +0.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.