H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jeff Tarango vs Guillaume Raoux H2H: 2-0

Jeff Tarango holds a 2–0 lead over Guillaume Raoux in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jeff Tarango leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jeff Tarango won the 1997 US Open round of 64 6-4 6-7(6) 6-7(3) 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Guillaume Raoux
FRA Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jeff Tarango #51 6-4 6-7(6) 6-7(3) 6-2 6-4 Guillaume Raoux #64 Match data Aug 29, 1997* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Jeff Tarango #117 6-4 6-3 Guillaume Raoux #89 Match data Sep 17, 1994* QF Bordeaux ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,788 240 294 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Guillaume Raoux #1,033 #35 1,041 1,808 175 223 44.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jeff Tarango Guillaume Raoux
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #448 1,493 0 0
19 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0 1989 1–6 14.3% #220 1,462 0 0
20 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0 1990 6–9 40.0% #84 1,529 0 0
21 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,607 0 0 1991 14–25 35.9% #104 1,616 0 0
22 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,613 0 0 1992 14–16 46.7% #93 1,619 0 1
23 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2 1993 27–28 49.1% #85 1,627 0 1
24 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2 1994 15–20 42.9% #115 1,573 0 1
25 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,655 0 2 1995 17–22 43.6% #77 1,567 0 1
26 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,654 0 2 1996 21–22 48.8% #72 1,621 0 1
27 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,619 0 2 1997 26–26 50.0% #47 1,728 0 1
28 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,693 0 2 1998 24–27 47.1% #53 1,735 0 1
29 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2 1999 10–19 34.5% #137 1,578 0 1
30 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2 2000 0–2 0.0% #668 1,553 0 1
31 2000 11–25 30.6% #112 1,517 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,447 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jeff Tarango Guillaume Raoux
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1988 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1989 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 4 16 20 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 5 13 61.5%
22 1991 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1992 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
23 1992 17 11 28 60.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1993 14 14 28 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 6 12 50.0%
24 1993 14 16 30 46.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
25 1994 18 18 36 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1995 8 9 17 47.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
26 1995 7 14 21 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1996 10 12 22 45.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
27 1996 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1997 12 14 26 46.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 6 5 11 54.5%
28 1997 20 13 33 60.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1998 16 13 29 55.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
29 1998 19 18 37 51.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1999 7 10 17 41.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
30 1999 6 11 17 35.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2000 2 14 16 12.5% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 146 167 313 46.6% 49 59 108 45.4% 14 27 41 34.1% 31 41 72 43.1% — 94 112 206 45.6% 14 36 50 28.0% 21 27 48 43.8% 46 48 94 48.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 411/468 of Jeff Tarango's and 339/375 of Guillaume Raoux's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jeff Tarango Guillaume Raoux
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 37/39 5.7 3.5 51.1% 72.6% 48.3% 53.7% 42.7% 60.7% 36.1%
22 1991 32/39 1.9 5.1 65.8% 64.8% 46.6% 56.0% 48.7% 58.5% 37.0% 1992 28/30 4.3 3.3 52.5% 71.6% 50.9% 61.6% 49.3% 61.8% 37.9%
23 1992 47/52 3.5 3.5 63.1% 67.5% 47.8% 56.6% 42.3% 60.3% 38.7% 1993 48/55 4.8 2.9 51.0% 74.0% 52.3% 58.5% 44.4% 63.1% 39.3%
24 1993 43/50 3.7 4.6 56.6% 68.4% 47.0% 59.2% 45.1% 59.1% 38.5% 1994 34/35 4.2 3.2 52.9% 72.1% 48.9% 54.2% 36.7% 61.2% 36.4%
25 1994 40/50 3.6 2.2 62.1% 65.8% 51.8% 56.4% 46.6% 60.6% 39.0% 1995 38/39 5.1 2.9 50.3% 72.5% 50.6% 58.8% 45.0% 61.8% 35.5%
26 1995 38/42 4.2 3.7 62.9% 70.3% 49.3% 54.4% 44.8% 62.3% 37.0% 1996 36/43 6.3 2.9 51.8% 75.4% 53.5% 59.8% 46.9% 65.0% 35.4%
27 1996 28/32 5.2 3.2 61.9% 68.0% 50.2% 54.3% 39.3% 61.4% 38.0% 1997 45/52 5.2 2.7 55.6% 74.8% 53.4% 55.0% 38.6% 65.6% 35.4%
28 1997 54/60 3.8 3.5 62.3% 69.2% 51.5% 52.2% 45.0% 62.3% 38.9% 1998 45/51 3.7 2.4 55.7% 70.5% 53.7% 63.3% 39.9% 63.2% 33.6%
29 1998 47/53 4.0 4.2 57.7% 67.9% 52.0% 51.3% 46.8% 61.1% 40.1% 1999 26/29 4.9 3.7 50.3% 70.5% 53.1% 61.5% 36.8% 61.8% 32.0%
30 1999 42/45 4.9 4.1 60.6% 67.1% 46.1% 61.0% 43.2% 58.9% 38.4% 2000 2/2 5.5 2.5 51.7% 70.6% 55.9% 75.0% 21.6% 63.6% 35.1%
31 2000 33/36 4.6 5.3 58.1% 68.9% 47.5% 56.9% 42.2% 60.1% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 7/9 3.3 2.1 62.4% 61.8% 52.7% 53.7% 51.2% 58.4% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 411/534 3.9 3.9 61.0% 67.8% 49.2% 55.7% 44.6% 60.5% 38.2% — 339/398 4.9 3.0 52.5% 72.8% 51.8% 58.5% 42.1% 62.9% 35.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jeff Tarango Guillaume Raoux
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1987 1508 108.5 — — — — +34 — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.19 1988 1493 101.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.67 — 0–1 — -0.12
19 1988 1598 124.9 — — — — +37 — — 51.4% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) — -0.05 1989 1463 110.5 — — — — +66 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–1 0–2 — -0.21
20 1989 1648 118.8 — — — — +7 — -102 46.4% -0.39 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12 1990 1530 117.3 — — — — +46 — +38 45.0% -0.22 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.60
21 1990 1607 120.5 — — — — +6 -46 -69 42.0% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.35 1991 1617 126.4 +0.36 -2.95 0.919 48.7% -14 — -57 38.5% -0.57 6–7 (46%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.55
22 1991 1613 132.3 -1.93 -1.26 0.892 48.2% +24 -37 — 41.8% -0.47 8–7 (53%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.07 1992 1620 126.0 -0.28 +0.33 0.993 50.1% 0 — -46 48.6% +0.11 2–6 (25%) 1–8 (11%) — +1.27
23 1992 1694 139.2 -0.84 +0.16 0.974 49.7% +28 -96 -139 50.4% +0.10 15–6 (71%) 10–14 (42%) — -1.21 1993 1628 138.5 +1.31 +1.04 1.066 51.2% +27 -183 -16 51.8% +0.17 5–13 (28%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.69
24 1993 1670 136.1 -1.01 -0.06 0.942 49.0% +18 -8 — 45.9% -0.28 12–6 (67%) 2–6 (25%) — -1.60 1994 1573 130.1 -0.73 -1.57 0.936 48.9% +66 -127 +7 43.7% -0.43 4–4 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.24
25 1994 1655 132.9 -1.13 +0.92 0.992 50.0% +24 -22 — 46.1% -0.03 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.47 1995 1567 120.6 -0.21 -2.56 0.930 48.9% +49 -88 -28 44.2% -0.47 7–6 (54%) 9–7 (56%) — +1.91
26 1995 1654 144.2 +0.56 -0.03 0.982 49.5% +7 -14 -104 43.3% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.34 1996 1621 132.1 +2.42 -1.48 1.013 50.4% +23 -150 -47 50.0% +0.10 6–8 (43%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.30
27 1996 1620 125.4 -0.16 +0.21 0.984 49.7% +74 -59 — 44.4% -0.35 4–7 (36%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.93 1997 1729 142.3 +2.81 -1.42 1.030 50.7% -9 -216 -38 54.5% +0.22 4–7 (36%) 17–8 (68%) — -0.78
28 1997 1694 143.8 +0.74 +1.18 1.031 50.6% +30 -59 -135 52.9% +0.29 7–11 (39%) 11–12 (48%) — -1.45 1998 1736 144.0 +1.79 -2.65 0.911 48.6% +35 -207 -109 50.4% -0.25 7–10 (41%) 23–9 (72%) — -2.53
29 1998 1660 141.3 -0.44 +2.15 1.031 50.5% +49 -71 -90 47.8% -0.04 7–14 (33%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.03 1999 1578 127.4 +0.36 -4.10 0.838 47.6% +71 — — 38.9% -0.83 2–5 (29%) 7–7 (50%) — +0.04
30 1999 1685 132.2 -2.40 -0.03 0.934 48.9% +15 -75 -110 46.4% -0.07 7–6 (54%) 6–6 (50%) — +1.16 2000 1554 113.4 -1.28 -1.62 0.966 48.4% — — — 28.6% -1.00 0–1 0–2 — +0.02
31 2000 1517 123.9 -0.88 -1.79 0.903 48.4% -8 +82 +47 38.3% -0.57 3–10 (23%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 1453 110.6 -0.42 -1.74 0.824 46.7% +20 — — 25.0% -1.60 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 1447 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2009 1455 101.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1788 140.0 -0.70 +0.24 0.968 49.5% +26 -27 -95 45.8% -0.19 84–94 (47%) 79–102 (44%) 95.5 -0.38 — 1808 138.0 +0.99 -1.61 0.965 49.6% +27 -165 -34 46.7% -0.22 45–72 (38%) 92–82 (53%) 100.7 -0.28

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.