H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jeff Tarango vs Henri Leconte H2H: 1-1
Jeff Tarango and Henri Leconte are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Henri Leconte leads 1–0 on carpet, while Jeff Tarango leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Henri Leconte won the 1992 Paris Masters second round 4-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 57
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 63
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 1992* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Carpet | Henri Leconte | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Jeff Tarango | Match data |
| Mar 17, 1990* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Jeff Tarango | 7-5 4-6 6-3 | Henri Leconte | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeff Tarango | #1,001 | #42 | 877 | 1,787 | 239 | 293 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Henri Leconte | #1,355 | #5 | 948 | 2,064 | 344 | 242 | 58.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jeff Tarango | Henri Leconte | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #440 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #377 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #29 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1988 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #96 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1990 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #131 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1991 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #106 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #6 | 1,972 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1992 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #45 | 1,694 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1993 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 47–19 | 71.2% | #9 | 1,936 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #78 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #115 | 1,798 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1995 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 1996 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #106 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #161 | 1,716 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 1997 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #61 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 1998 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #73 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #101 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 1999 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #55 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,737 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 2000 | 10–24 | 29.4% | #112 | 1,515 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,632 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #323 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1001 | 1,558 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #730 | 1,446 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |