H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jeff Tarango vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 0-1
Hyung-Taik Lee holds a 1–0 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hyung-Taik Lee leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hyung-Taik Lee won the 2000 US Open first round 6-3 3-6 6-3 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 57
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2000* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Hyung-Taik Lee | 6-3 3-6 6-3 7-6(6) | Jeff Tarango | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeff Tarango | #1,001 | #42 | 877 | 1,787 | 239 | 293 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jeff Tarango | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #377 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #96 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #131 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #106 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #45 | 1,694 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #78 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #106 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #73 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #55 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 10–24 | 29.4% | #112 | 1,515 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #323 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #730 | 1,446 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |