H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Jeff Tarango vs Jaime Oncins H2H: 3-0

Jeff Tarango holds a 3–0 lead over Jaime Oncins in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jeff Tarango leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jeff Tarango won the 1993 Philadelphia third round 6-2 2-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Jaime Oncins
BRA Age 56 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 18, 1993* Philadelphia ATP 250 R32 Carpet Jeff Tarango #65 6-2 2-6 7-5 Jaime Oncins #43 Match data
Feb 6, 1993* San Francisco ATP 250 QF Hard Jeff Tarango #67 6-3 6-0 Jaime Oncins #46 Match data
May 25, 1991* Bologna ATP 250 QF Clay Jeff Tarango #108 4-6 6-3 6-2 Jaime Oncins #92 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Jaime Oncins #1,034 #34 773 1,796 61 86 41.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jeff Tarango Jaime Oncins
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0 1988 1–2 33.3% #314 1,493 0 0
19 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0 1989 0–2 0.0% #263 1,471 0 0
20 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0 1990 0–4 0.0% #113 1,443 0 0
21 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0 1991 22–17 56.4% #64 1,677 0 0
22 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0 1992 24–18 57.1% #48 1,765 0 2
23 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2 1993 11–23 32.4% #133 1,578 0 2
24 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2 1994 1–7 12.5% #230 1,502 0 2
25 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2 1995 1–2 33.3% #222 1,505 0 2
26 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2 1996 0–2 0.0% #160 1,488 0 2
27 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2 1997 0–6 0.0% #166 1,436 0 2
28 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2 1998 1–2 33.3% #223 1,448 0 2
29 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2 2001 0–1 0.0% #1031 1,435 0 2
32 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2 — — — — — — —