H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jeff Tarango vs Jeremy Bates H2H: 2-0

Jeff Tarango holds a 2–0 lead over Jeremy Bates in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jeff Tarango leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jeff Tarango won the 1996 Shanghai Masters round of 32 6-4 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Jeremy Bates
GBR Age 64 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jeff Tarango #73 6-4 7-6(3) Jeremy Bates #161 Match data Feb 1, 1996* R32 Shanghai Masters World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Jeff Tarango #105 6-1 5-7 6-3 Jeremy Bates #127 Match data Apr 6, 1994* R64 Japan Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,788 240 294 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Jeremy Bates #1,314 #54 700 1,717 117 175 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jeff Tarango Jeremy Bates
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% #372 1,482 0 0
19 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,494 0 0
20 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0 1982 0–2 0.0% — 1,470 0 0
21 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,607 0 0 1983 1–4 20.0% #329 1,466 0 0
22 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,613 0 0 1984 0–6 0.0% #185 1,397 0 0
23 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2 1985 9–11 45.0% #99 1,479 0 0
24 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2 1986 9–16 36.0% #187 1,513 0 0
25 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,655 0 2 1987 12–10 54.5% #89 1,644 0 0
26 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,654 0 2 1988 15–19 44.1% #152 1,622 0 0
27 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,619 0 2 1989 13–12 52.0% #96 1,659 0 0
28 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,693 0 2 1990 6–18 25.0% #126 1,529 0 0
29 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2 1991 4–5 44.4% #168 1,571 0 0
30 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2 1992 7–12 36.8% #105 1,582 0 0
31 2000 11–25 30.6% #112 1,517 0 2 1993 12–17 41.4% #98 1,595 0 0
32 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2 1994 16–16 50.0% #77 1,618 0 1
33 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,447 0 2 1995 12–22 35.3% #143 1,522 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1996 0–3 0.0% #600 1,485 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jeff Tarango Jeremy Bates
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1988 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1981 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1989 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1991 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
23 1992 17 11 28 60.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1985 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1993 14 16 30 46.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1994 18 18 36 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1987 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1995 7 14 21 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1988 8 12 20 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
27 1996 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1989 9 9 18 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 1997 20 13 33 60.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1990 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
29 1998 19 18 37 51.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 1999 6 11 17 35.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1992 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2000 2 14 16 12.5% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1993 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 2001 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 2 6 8 25.0%
33 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 6 11 17 35.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 146 167 313 46.6% 49 59 108 45.4% 14 27 41 34.1% 31 41 72 43.1% — 58 80 138 42.0% 8 21 29 27.6% 34 44 78 43.6% 17 30 47 36.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 411/468 of Jeff Tarango's and 106/126 of Jeremy Bates's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jeff Tarango Jeremy Bates
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 1991 32/39 1.9 5.1 65.8% 64.8% 46.6% 56.0% 48.7% 58.5% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1992 47/52 3.5 3.5 63.1% 67.5% 47.8% 56.6% 42.3% 60.3% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1993 43/50 3.7 4.6 56.6% 68.4% 47.0% 59.2% 45.1% 59.1% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1994 40/50 3.6 2.2 62.1% 65.8% 51.8% 56.4% 46.6% 60.6% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1995 38/42 4.2 3.7 62.9% 70.3% 49.3% 54.4% 44.8% 62.3% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1996 28/32 5.2 3.2 61.9% 68.0% 50.2% 54.3% 39.3% 61.4% 38.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1997 54/60 3.8 3.5 62.3% 69.2% 51.5% 52.2% 45.0% 62.3% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 47/53 4.0 4.2 57.7% 67.9% 52.0% 51.3% 46.8% 61.1% 40.1% 1991 7/9 3.1 3.3 61.5% 69.8% 53.1% 62.7% 33.5% 63.1% 35.3%
30 1999 42/45 4.9 4.1 60.6% 67.1% 46.1% 61.0% 43.2% 58.9% 38.4% 1992 17/19 3.9 3.8 60.0% 69.8% 42.1% 60.1% 47.3% 58.6% 35.2%
31 2000 33/36 4.6 5.3 58.1% 68.9% 47.5% 56.9% 42.2% 60.1% 36.0% 1993 24/29 2.0 2.9 53.4% 64.7% 48.5% 50.3% 44.1% 57.3% 37.7%
32 2001 7/9 3.3 2.1 62.4% 61.8% 52.7% 53.7% 51.2% 58.4% 34.3% 1994 26/32 4.0 4.7 52.9% 73.0% 48.2% 63.0% 46.0% 61.3% 34.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 30/34 3.8 4.2 53.1% 68.6% 44.8% 45.6% 39.7% 57.2% 36.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 2/3 4.5 5.5 57.5% 66.0% 46.0% 61.1% 14.3% 57.6% 32.1%
Career — 411/534 3.9 3.9 61.0% 67.8% 49.2% 55.7% 44.6% 60.5% 38.2% — 106/292 3.4 3.9 54.9% 69.0% 46.6% 54.7% 42.6% 58.9% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jeff Tarango Jeremy Bates
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1987 1508 108.5 — — — — +34 — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.19 1980 1482 97.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.25
19 1988 1598 124.9 — — — — +37 — — 51.4% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) — -0.05 1981 1495 98.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.00 — — — +0.12
20 1989 1648 118.8 — — — — +7 — -102 46.4% -0.39 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12 1982 1470 96.1 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.50 0–1 — — +0.09
21 1990 1607 120.5 — — — — +6 -46 -69 42.0% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.35 1983 1467 110.8 — — — — — — — 18.2% -1.91 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.21
22 1991 1613 132.3 -1.93 -1.26 0.892 48.2% +24 -37 — 41.8% -0.47 8–7 (53%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.07 1984 1398 90.5 — — — — — — +36 13.3% -2.33 0–2 1–1 — +0.70
23 1992 1694 139.2 -0.84 +0.16 0.974 49.7% +28 -96 -139 50.4% +0.10 15–6 (71%) 10–14 (42%) — -1.21 1985 1480 114.0 — — — — +93 — -61 46.8% -0.26 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) — +1.57
24 1993 1670 136.1 -1.01 -0.06 0.942 49.0% +18 -8 — 45.9% -0.28 12–6 (67%) 2–6 (25%) — -1.60 1986 1514 122.4 — — — — +60 -52 -37 44.6% -0.57 2–8 (20%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.61
25 1994 1655 132.9 -1.13 +0.92 0.992 50.0% +24 -22 — 46.1% -0.03 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.47 1987 1645 121.6 — — — — -16 — -76 51.7% +0.21 6–3 (67%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.46
26 1995 1654 144.2 +0.56 -0.03 0.982 49.5% +7 -14 -104 43.3% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.34 1988 1623 121.3 — — — — -11 -108 -55 41.7% -0.74 10–5 (67%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.50
27 1996 1620 125.4 -0.16 +0.21 0.984 49.7% +74 -59 — 44.4% -0.35 4–7 (36%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.93 1989 1659 123.3 — — — — -14 -100 -69 52.3% -0.03 2–2 (50%) 6–4 (60%) — +1.18
28 1997 1694 143.8 +0.74 +1.18 1.031 50.6% +30 -59 -135 52.9% +0.29 7–11 (39%) 11–12 (48%) — -1.45 1990 1529 118.0 — — — — +33 — +70 33.9% -0.97 2–6 (25%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.28
29 1998 1660 141.3 -0.44 +2.15 1.031 50.5% +49 -71 -90 47.8% -0.04 7–14 (33%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.03 1991 1572 117.8 +0.31 +0.02 0.958 49.0% -15 — +54 45.8% -0.50 1–1 3–1 (75%) — -0.30
30 1999 1685 132.2 -2.40 -0.03 0.934 48.9% +15 -75 -110 46.4% -0.07 7–6 (54%) 6–6 (50%) — +1.16 1992 1582 113.5 -1.79 -1.18 0.850 47.0% -68 — +93 43.8% -0.58 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.12
31 2000 1517 123.9 -0.88 -1.79 0.903 48.4% -8 +82 +47 38.3% -0.57 3–10 (23%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.28 1993 1595 125.5 -2.87 +0.17 0.884 47.4% -23 — +86 38.8% -0.60 4–1 (80%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.79
32 2001 1453 110.6 -0.42 -1.74 0.824 46.7% +20 — — 25.0% -1.60 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.01 1994 1618 127.5 -0.88 -2.29 0.893 48.2% -29 — +141 52.4% -0.13 5–7 (42%) 7–5 (58%) — +1.49
33 2002 1447 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.06 1995 1523 122.8 -4.22 -1.39 0.847 46.5% +33 — +186 33.3% -1.05 5–2 (71%) 7–8 (47%) — +1.42
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1485 94.4 -1.81 -0.66 0.757 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.04
40 2009 1455 101.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1788 140.0 -0.70 +0.24 0.968 49.5% +26 -27 -95 45.8% -0.19 84–94 (47%) 79–102 (44%) 95.5 -0.38 — 1718 125.6 -2.36 -1.12 0.872 47.3% +3 -78 +30 42.1% -0.60 42–45 (48%) 53–55 (49%) 104.9 +2.93

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.