H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Jeff Tarango vs Jimmy Arias H2H: 1-1

Jeff Tarango and Jimmy Arias are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jeff Tarango leads 1–0 on clay, while Jimmy Arias leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jeff Tarango won the 1992 Charlotte third round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Jimmy Arias
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 7, 1992* Charlotte ATP 250 R32 Clay Jeff Tarango #68 6-4 6-4 Jimmy Arias #134 Match data
Aug 17, 1989* Montreal / Toronto Masters 1000 R32 Hard Jimmy Arias #96 6-2 6-2 Jeff Tarango #114 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Jimmy Arias #714 #5 587 2,067 281 217 56.4% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jeff Tarango Jimmy Arias
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1980 3–5 37.5% #255 1,530 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1981 10–10 50.0% #84 1,626 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1982 30–17 63.8% #21 1,858 0 1
18 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0 1983 47–15 75.8% #6 2,045 0 5
19 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0 1984 35–19 64.8% #14 1,879 0 5
20 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0 1985 32–21 60.4% #21 1,810 0 5
21 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0 1986 18–19 48.6% #48 1,668 0 5
22 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0 1987 22–18 55.0% #34 1,720 0 5
23 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2 1988 7–14 33.3% #106 1,615 0 5
24 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2 1989 17–17 50.0% #92 1,696 0 5
25 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2 1990 24–26 48.0% #60 1,681 0 5
26 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2 1991 23–19 54.8% #63 1,691 0 5
27 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2 1992 4–8 33.3% #195 1,644 0 5
28 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2 1993 5–4 55.6% #178 1,664 0 5
29 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2 1994 3–4 42.9% #334 1,638 0 5
30 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2 1998 1–1 50.0% #711 1,640 0 5