H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jeff Tarango vs Jonathan Stark H2H: 3-0
Jeff Tarango holds a 3–0 lead over Jonathan Stark in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jeff Tarango leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jeff Tarango won the 1998 Philadelphia fourth round 6-2 6-7(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 57
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 1998* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jeff Tarango | 6-2 6-7(4) 6-3 | Jonathan Stark | Match data |
| Apr 14, 1994* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jeff Tarango | 6-2 6-3 | Jonathan Stark | Match data |
| Feb 4, 1994* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jeff Tarango | 5-7 6-3 6-3 | Jonathan Stark | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeff Tarango | #1,001 | #42 | 877 | 1,787 | 239 | 293 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jonathan Stark | #829 | #36 | 913 | 1,801 | 135 | 150 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jeff Tarango | Jonathan Stark | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #377 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #96 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1007 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #243 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #131 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #106 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #38 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1992 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #45 | 1,694 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1993 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #78 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #68 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1995 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #96 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1996 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #106 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #266 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1997 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #300 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1998 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #73 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #512 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1999 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #55 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2000 | 10–24 | 29.4% | #112 | 1,515 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #323 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #730 | 1,446 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |