H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jeff Tarango vs Leander Paes H2H: 1-2

Leander Paes holds a 2–1 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Leander Paes leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Leander Paes won the 1997 Shanghai quarterfinal 6-3 2-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Leander Paes
IND Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 1, 1997* Shanghai ATP 250 QF Carpet Leander Paes #122 6-3 2-6 6-3 Jeff Tarango #82 Match data
Jun 13, 1996* Rosmalen ATP 250 R32 Grass Leander Paes #143 7-5 7-6(5) Jeff Tarango #90 Match data
Apr 27, 1995* Seoul ATP 250 R32 Hard Jeff Tarango #89 6-3 6-1 Leander Paes #127 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Leander Paes #1,102 #73 611 1,727 48 74 39.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jeff Tarango Leander Paes
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0 1991 1–2 33.3% #278 1,492 0 0
19 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0 1993 1–3 25.0% #260 1,489 0 0
21 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0 1994 2–3 40.0% #139 1,500 0 0
22 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0 1995 3–9 25.0% #130 1,489 0 0
23 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2 1996 8–10 44.4% #129 1,559 0 0
24 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2 1997 13–18 41.9% #122 1,612 0 0
25 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2 1998 13–10 56.5% #91 1,652 0 1
26 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2 1999 3–9 25.0% #142 1,557 0 1
27 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2 2000 3–5 37.5% #188 1,546 0 1
28 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2 2001 1–2 33.3% #299 1,601 0 1
29 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2 2002 0–1 0.0% #998 1,584 0 1
30 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2 2003 0–1 0.0% #1032 1,576 0 1
31 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2 2005 0–1 0.0% #1102 1,555 0 1
33 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2 — — — — — — —