H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jeff Tarango vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 0-1

Mark Woodforde holds a 1–0 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Woodforde leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mark Woodforde won the 1996 Coral Springs third round 6-0 5-7 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Mark Woodforde
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 16, 1996* Coral Springs ATP 250 R32 Clay Mark Woodforde #20 6-0 5-7 6-3 Jeff Tarango #84 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,922 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jeff Tarango Mark Woodforde
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0
20 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,546 0 1
21 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1
22 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,800 0 2
23 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,710 0 3
24 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,716 0 3
25 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,631 0 3
26 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,814 0 3
27 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4
28 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4
29 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,760 0 4
30 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,800 0 4
31 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,731 0 4
32 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4
33 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,611 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,584 0 4