H2H data updated: 2026-08-23 21:17 UTC

Jeff Tarango vs Nenad Zimonjic H2H: 0-1

Nenad Zimonjic holds a 1–0 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nenad Zimonjic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nenad Zimonjic won the 1999 Wimbledon round of 64 7-6(5) 1-6 6-3 7-6(6).

USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 1
1 main draw meetings
SRB Age 50 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nenad Zimonjic #266 7-6(5) 1-6 6-3 7-6(6) Jeff Tarango #95 Match data Jun 25, 1999* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,788 240 294 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Nenad Zimonjic #1,373 #176 263 1,551 6 15 28.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jeff Tarango Nenad Zimonjic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,607 0 0
22 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,613 0 0
23 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2 1999 2–3 40.0% #311 1,526 0 0
24 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,655 0 2 2001 1–4 20.0% #204 1,511 0 0
26 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,654 0 2
27 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,619 0 2 2003 1–3 25.0% #497 1,465 0 0
28 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,693 0 2 2004 1–2 33.3% #342 1,469 0 0
29 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2 2005 1–1 50.0% #562 1,485 0 0
30 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2 2006 0–1 0.0% #555 1,465 0 0
31 2000 11–25 30.6% #112 1,517 0 2 2007 0–1 0.0% #692 1,441 0 0
32 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,447 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jeff Tarango Nenad Zimonjic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1987 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1988 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1989 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1991 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1992 17 11 28 60.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1993 14 16 30 46.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1994 18 18 36 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1995 7 14 21 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 1996 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1997 20 13 33 60.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1998 19 18 37 51.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2005 1 1 2 50.0%
30 1999 6 11 17 35.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2006 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2000 2 14 16 12.5% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2007 0 1 1 0.0%
32 2001 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2002 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 146 167 313 46.6% 49 59 108 45.4% 14 27 41 34.1% 31 41 72 43.1% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 411/468 of Jeff Tarango's and 21/21 of Nenad Zimonjic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jeff Tarango Nenad Zimonjic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 1991 32/39 1.9 5.1 65.8% 64.8% 46.6% 56.0% 48.7% 58.5% 37.0% —/—
23 1992 47/52 3.5 3.5 63.1% 67.5% 47.8% 56.6% 42.3% 60.3% 38.7% 1999 5/5 9.2 6.2 61.1% 69.6% 36.1% 47.0% 35.4% 56.8% 26.0%
24 1993 43/50 3.7 4.6 56.6% 68.4% 47.0% 59.2% 45.1% 59.1% 38.5% —/—
25 1994 40/50 3.6 2.2 62.1% 65.8% 51.8% 56.4% 46.6% 60.6% 39.0% 2001 5/5 7.2 4.6 59.3% 70.4% 52.3% 70.8% 27.1% 63.2% 30.4%
26 1995 38/42 4.2 3.7 62.9% 70.3% 49.3% 54.4% 44.8% 62.3% 37.0% —/—
27 1996 28/32 5.2 3.2 61.9% 68.0% 50.2% 54.3% 39.3% 61.4% 38.0% 2003 4/4 8.0 3.5 68.5% 74.8% 40.7% 61.1% 45.8% 63.9% 30.7%
28 1997 54/60 3.8 3.5 62.3% 69.2% 51.5% 52.2% 45.0% 62.3% 38.9% 2004 3/3 7.3 5.3 63.2% 66.2% 50.7% 25.0% 27.8% 60.6% 34.9%
29 1998 47/53 4.0 4.2 57.7% 67.9% 52.0% 51.3% 46.8% 61.1% 40.1% 2005 2/2 13.0 4.5 67.0% 72.9% 54.6% 66.7% 29.2% 67.1% 29.8%
30 1999 42/45 4.9 4.1 60.6% 67.1% 46.1% 61.0% 43.2% 58.9% 38.4% 2006 1/1 11.0 4.0 48.1% 67.3% 48.2% 60.0% 0.0% 57.4% 31.2%
31 2000 33/36 4.6 5.3 58.1% 68.9% 47.5% 56.9% 42.2% 60.1% 36.0% 2007 1/1 8.0 2.0 63.9% 79.5% 63.6% 66.7% 73.8% 19.4%
32 2001 7/9 3.3 2.1 62.4% 61.8% 52.7% 53.7% 51.2% 58.4% 34.3% —/—
Career 411/534 3.9 3.9 61.0% 67.8% 49.2% 55.7% 44.6% 60.5% 38.2% 21/21 8.6 4.7 62.5% 71.0% 46.6% 55.6% 30.4% 62.0% 29.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jeff Tarango Nenad Zimonjic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
18 1987 1508 108.5 +34 20.0% -1.80 0–1 1–1 -0.19
19 1988 1598 124.9 +37 51.4% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) -0.05
20 1989 1648 118.8 +7 -102 46.4% -0.39 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) +0.12
21 1990 1607 120.5 +6 -46 -69 42.0% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 3–5 (38%) +0.73
22 1991 1613 132.3 -1.93 -1.26 0.892 48.2% +24 -37 41.8% -0.47 8–7 (53%) 7–8 (47%) -0.08
23 1992 1694 139.2 -0.84 +0.16 0.974 49.7% +28 -96 -139 50.4% +0.10 15–6 (71%) 10–14 (42%) -0.71 1999 1527 95.8 -1.55 -4.30 0.600 42.9% +80 40.0% -1.60 4–1 (80%) +0.21
24 1993 1670 136.1 -1.01 -0.06 0.942 49.0% +18 -8 45.9% -0.28 12–6 (67%) 2–6 (25%) -1.55 2000 1510 102.7
25 1994 1655 132.9 -1.13 +0.92 0.992 50.0% +24 -22 46.1% -0.03 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) +1.56 2001 1511 110.0 -0.74 -1.21 0.826 47.5% +41 28.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) +0.13
26 1995 1654 144.2 +0.56 -0.03 0.982 49.5% +7 -14 -104 43.3% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 7–10 (41%) -1.22 2002 1491 99.6
27 1996 1620 125.4 -0.16 +0.21 0.984 49.7% +74 -59 44.4% -0.35 4–7 (36%) 7–5 (58%) +1.14 2003 1465 106.0 +0.34 -1.23 0.852 47.7% 33.3% -0.78 0–1 1–2 (33%) +0.02
28 1997 1694 143.8 +0.74 +1.18 1.031 50.6% +30 -59 -135 52.9% +0.29 7–11 (39%) 11–12 (48%) -1.15 2004 1470 108.1 -1.22 +0.06 0.887 47.4% 42.9% -1.00 0–1 2–0 +0.03
29 1998 1660 141.3 -0.44 +2.15 1.031 50.5% +49 -71 -90 47.8% -0.04 7–14 (33%) 7–12 (37%) -0.28 2005 1485 104.0 +4.49 -0.22 0.905 49.0% 40.0% 0.00 1–0 0–2 -0.30
30 1999 1685 132.2 -2.40 -0.03 0.934 48.9% +15 -75 -110 46.4% -0.07 7–6 (54%) 6–6 (50%) +1.63 2006 1465 106.8 +0.26 +4.12 0.732 45.3% 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 -0.16
31 2000 1517 123.9 -0.88 -1.79 0.903 48.4% -8 +82 +47 38.3% -0.57 3–10 (23%) 6–12 (33%) -0.11 2007 1442 98.9 -2.83 -0.57 0.738 46.3% 0.0% -2.00 0–1 -0.02
32 2001 1453 110.6 -0.42 -1.74 0.824 46.7% +20 25.0% -1.60 0–2 1–2 (33%) +0.04 2008 1457 101.6
33 2002 1447 103.8 0.0% -2.50 -0.05 2009 1459 106.0
37 2013 1461 103.0
40 2009 1455 101.8
Career 1788 140.0 -0.70 +0.24 0.968 49.5% +26 -27 -95 45.8% -0.19 84–94 (47%) 79–102 (44%) -0.03 1552 107.6 -0.35 -1.39 0.777 46.4% +41 +80 34.5% -1.15 2–5 (29%) 9–8 (53%) -0.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.