H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC

Jeff Tarango vs Paul Goldstein H2H: 0-1

Paul Goldstein holds a 1–0 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paul Goldstein leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Paul Goldstein won the 2000 Wimbledon second round 3-6 6-2 5-7 6-2 12-10.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Paul Goldstein
USA Age 49 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 30, 2000* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Paul Goldstein #76 3-6 6-2 5-7 6-2 12-10 Jeff Tarango #60 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Paul Goldstein #1,120 #58 668 1,746 85 115 42.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jeff Tarango Paul Goldstein
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% #781 1,480 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #1219 1,465 0 0
18 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0 1995 0–1 0.0% #1011 1,453 0 0
19 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0 1996 0–1 0.0% #432 1,437 0 0
20 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0 1998 1–3 25.0% #189 1,464 0 0
22 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0 1999 12–15 44.4% #89 1,615 0 0
23 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2 2000 20–23 46.5% #81 1,634 0 0
24 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2 2001 5–10 33.3% #143 1,582 0 0
25 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2 2002 1–3 25.0% #182 1,561 0 0
26 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2 2003 4–5 44.4% #107 1,539 0 0
27 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2 2004 4–6 40.0% #190 1,585 0 0
28 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2 2005 13–12 52.0% #67 1,627 0 0
29 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2 2006 16–21 43.2% #70 1,593 0 0
30 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2 2007 9–13 40.9% #166 1,575 0 0
31 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2 — — — — — — —