H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jeff Tarango vs Sandon Stolle H2H: 2-0

Jeff Tarango holds a 2–0 lead over Sandon Stolle in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jeff Tarango leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jeff Tarango won the 1998 Philadelphia round of 32 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Sandon Stolle
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jeff Tarango #61 7-5 6-1 Sandon Stolle #99 Match data Feb 26, 1998* R32 Philadelphia ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Jeff Tarango #100 6-3 6-3 Sandon Stolle #170 Match data Apr 22, 1994* R16 Seoul ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,788 240 294 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Sandon Stolle #1,379 #50 810 1,745 100 120 45.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jeff Tarango Sandon Stolle
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0 1989 0–1 0.0% #813 1,485 0 0
19 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0 1990 2–3 40.0% #228 1,513 0 0
20 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0 1991 5–7 41.7% #156 1,541 0 0
21 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,607 0 0 1992 19–20 48.7% #71 1,606 0 0
22 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,613 0 0 1993 8–19 29.6% #182 1,577 0 0
23 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2 1994 4–6 40.0% #212 1,608 0 0
24 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2 1995 7–9 43.8% #179 1,614 0 0
25 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,655 0 2 1996 24–20 54.5% #58 1,684 0 0
26 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,654 0 2 1997 22–19 53.7% #83 1,729 0 0
27 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,619 0 2 1998 6–12 33.3% #238 1,622 0 0
28 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,693 0 2 1999 3–4 42.9% #375 1,618 0 0
29 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2000 11–25 30.6% #112 1,517 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,447 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jeff Tarango Sandon Stolle
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1988 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
21 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 13 15 28 46.4% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1991 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1993 6 13 19 31.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
23 1992 17 11 28 60.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1994 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1993 14 16 30 46.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1995 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1994 18 18 36 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1996 13 11 24 54.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1995 7 14 21 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1997 10 10 20 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — —
27 1996 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1998 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 1997 20 13 33 60.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 1998 19 18 37 51.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 6 11 17 35.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 2 14 16 12.5% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 146 167 313 46.6% 49 59 108 45.4% 14 27 41 34.1% 31 41 72 43.1% — 58 78 136 42.6% 10 15 25 40.0% 27 21 48 56.2% 5 6 11 45.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 411/468 of Jeff Tarango's and 175/214 of Sandon Stolle's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jeff Tarango Sandon Stolle
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 9/12 7.7 9.8 55.4% 70.7% 45.6% 64.3% 47.6% 59.5% 35.9%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 32/39 5.9 5.5 55.4% 72.2% 46.8% 50.8% 46.6% 61.1% 35.1%
22 1991 32/39 1.9 5.1 65.8% 64.8% 46.6% 56.0% 48.7% 58.5% 37.0% 1993 22/27 6.0 6.7 52.4% 72.6% 42.1% 52.9% 49.8% 58.1% 33.5%
23 1992 47/52 3.5 3.5 63.1% 67.5% 47.8% 56.6% 42.3% 60.3% 38.7% 1994 8/10 6.4 4.9 62.3% 70.2% 40.8% 58.6% 35.6% 59.1% 38.0%
24 1993 43/50 3.7 4.6 56.6% 68.4% 47.0% 59.2% 45.1% 59.1% 38.5% 1995 14/16 7.0 6.0 60.8% 70.2% 46.3% 46.2% 33.4% 60.8% 35.8%
25 1994 40/50 3.6 2.2 62.1% 65.8% 51.8% 56.4% 46.6% 60.6% 39.0% 1996 35/44 6.1 4.6 58.2% 73.8% 44.3% 52.9% 37.6% 61.5% 37.8%
26 1995 38/42 4.2 3.7 62.9% 70.3% 49.3% 54.4% 44.8% 62.3% 37.0% 1997 36/41 7.7 4.8 57.4% 75.0% 46.8% 55.8% 35.7% 63.2% 37.0%
27 1996 28/32 5.2 3.2 61.9% 68.0% 50.2% 54.3% 39.3% 61.4% 38.0% 1998 14/18 6.0 2.9 60.9% 72.4% 46.4% 52.1% 33.9% 62.2% 38.5%
28 1997 54/60 3.8 3.5 62.3% 69.2% 51.5% 52.2% 45.0% 62.3% 38.9% 1999 5/7 8.6 5.0 59.9% 74.7% 44.4% 58.8% 31.6% 63.3% 33.1%
29 1998 47/53 4.0 4.2 57.7% 67.9% 52.0% 51.3% 46.8% 61.1% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 42/45 4.9 4.1 60.6% 67.1% 46.1% 61.0% 43.2% 58.9% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 33/36 4.6 5.3 58.1% 68.9% 47.5% 56.9% 42.2% 60.1% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 7/9 3.3 2.1 62.4% 61.8% 52.7% 53.7% 51.2% 58.4% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 411/534 3.9 3.9 61.0% 67.8% 49.2% 55.7% 44.6% 60.5% 38.2% — 175/220 6.6 5.3 57.3% 72.9% 45.2% 53.5% 40.0% 61.2% 36.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jeff Tarango Sandon Stolle
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1987 1508 108.5 — — — — +34 — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.19 1989 1485 100.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.19
19 1988 1598 124.9 — — — — +37 — — 51.4% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) — -0.05 1990 1513 114.1 — — — — +39 — — 50.0% -1.00 0–2 1–0 — -0.30
20 1989 1648 118.8 — — — — +7 — -102 46.4% -0.39 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12 1991 1541 114.1 -1.27 -0.64 0.887 48.1% +5 — — 41.7% -0.56 4–3 (57%) 4–8 (33%) — +0.54
21 1990 1607 120.5 — — — — +6 -46 -69 42.0% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.35 1992 1607 127.6 -0.48 -1.69 0.902 48.3% -23 — +85 48.4% +0.10 7–4 (64%) 7–9 (44%) — +1.62
22 1991 1613 132.3 -1.93 -1.26 0.892 48.2% +24 -37 — 41.8% -0.47 8–7 (53%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.07 1993 1578 122.0 -2.38 -2.07 0.801 46.1% 0 -77 +98 36.6% -1.01 4–6 (40%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.20
23 1992 1694 139.2 -0.84 +0.16 0.974 49.7% +28 -96 -139 50.4% +0.10 15–6 (71%) 10–14 (42%) — -1.21 1994 1608 125.5 -1.19 +0.52 0.927 48.7% -2 — — 38.5% -0.73 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.16
24 1993 1670 136.1 -1.01 -0.06 0.942 49.0% +18 -8 — 45.9% -0.28 12–6 (67%) 2–6 (25%) — -1.60 1995 1614 122.4 -0.39 -0.62 0.913 48.7% -10 — +48 46.5% -0.12 3–4 (43%) 1–7 (13%) — -0.32
25 1994 1655 132.9 -1.13 +0.92 0.992 50.0% +24 -22 — 46.1% -0.03 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.47 1996 1684 131.4 -0.42 -0.13 0.979 49.5% -48 -190 +102 50.9% +0.18 8–4 (67%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.89
26 1995 1654 144.2 +0.56 -0.03 0.982 49.5% +7 -14 -104 43.3% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.34 1997 1729 128.4 +1.11 -0.21 1.004 50.1% -49 -172 +73 54.8% +0.14 7–7 (50%) 13–4 (76%) — +0.02
27 1996 1620 125.4 -0.16 +0.21 0.984 49.7% +74 -59 — 44.4% -0.35 4–7 (36%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.93 1998 1622 124.1 -0.05 -0.07 1.018 50.6% +27 — — 43.2% -0.34 0–6 (0%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.60
28 1997 1694 143.8 +0.74 +1.18 1.031 50.6% +30 -59 -135 52.9% +0.29 7–11 (39%) 11–12 (48%) — -1.45 1999 1619 118.5 -0.31 -1.92 0.903 48.6% +28 — — 52.2% 0.00 0–2 3–2 (60%) — +0.31
29 1998 1660 141.3 -0.44 +2.15 1.031 50.5% +49 -71 -90 47.8% -0.04 7–14 (33%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 1685 132.2 -2.40 -0.03 0.934 48.9% +15 -75 -110 46.4% -0.07 7–6 (54%) 6–6 (50%) — +1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 1517 123.9 -0.88 -1.79 0.903 48.4% -8 +82 +47 38.3% -0.57 3–10 (23%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 1453 110.6 -0.42 -1.74 0.824 46.7% +20 — — 25.0% -1.60 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 1447 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2009 1455 101.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1788 140.0 -0.70 +0.24 0.968 49.5% +26 -27 -95 45.8% -0.19 84–94 (47%) 79–102 (44%) 95.5 -0.38 — 1746 132.7 -0.41 -0.76 0.934 48.9% -15 -164 +83 47.2% -0.18 35–40 (47%) 44–53 (45%) 99.1 +1.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.