H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Jeff Tarango vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 4-0

Jeff Tarango holds a 4–0 lead over Vincent Spadea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jeff Tarango leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jeff Tarango won the 1999 Moscow third round 7-6(5) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Vincent Spadea
USA Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 11, 1999* Moscow ATP 250 R32 Carpet Jeff Tarango #73 7-6(5) 6-2 Vincent Spadea #21 Match data
May 22, 1997* St. Poelten ATP 250 R32 Clay Jeff Tarango #74 6-4 6-0 Vincent Spadea #101 Match data
Feb 20, 1997* Memphis ATP 250 R32 Hard Jeff Tarango #79 6-3 6-4 Vincent Spadea #58 Match data
Aug 3, 1995* Los Angeles ATP 250 R32 Hard Jeff Tarango #67 6-2 6-3 Vincent Spadea #74 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Vincent Spadea #1,474 #18 1,629 1,876 310 348 47.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Jeff Tarango Vincent Spadea
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0 1993 1–5 16.7% #303 1,483 0 0
1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0 1994 11–13 45.8% #75 1,561 0 0
1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0 1995 21–28 42.9% #81 1,639 0 0
1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0 1996 27–22 55.1% #54 1,711 0 0
1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0 1997 20–26 43.5% #88 1,695 0 0
1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2 1998 28–27 50.9% #42 1,752 0 0
1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2 1999 33–27 55.0% #20 1,763 0 0
1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2 2000 3–23 11.5% #213 1,545 0 0
1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2 2001 1–3 25.0% #125 1,534 0 0
1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2 2002 13–17 43.3% #67 1,623 0 0
1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2 2003 34–25 57.6% #29 1,723 0 0
1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2 2004 39–25 60.9% #20 1,784 0 1
1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2 2005 21–24 46.7% #75 1,665 0 1
2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2 2006 19–26 42.2% #73 1,627 0 1
2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2 2007 24–28 46.2% #77 1,650 0 1
2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2 2008 13–19 40.6% #76 1,657 0 1
— — — — — — — 2009 2–9 18.2% #295 1,526 0 1
— — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #1517 1,480 0 1