H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Jeff Tarango vs Diego Camacho H2H: 1-0

Jeff Tarango holds a 1–0 lead over Diego Camacho in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jeff Tarango leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jeff Tarango won the 2000 Sydney Olympics first round 6-0 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Diego Camacho
BOL Age 43

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jeff Tarango #78 6-0 6-1 Diego Camacho Match data Sep 21, 2000* R64 Sydney Olympics Olympics Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,788 240 294 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Diego Camacho #1,413 #954 5 1,500 0 1 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jeff Tarango Diego Camacho
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #957 1,486 0 0
18 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,607 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2 — — — — — — —
24 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2 — — — — — — —
25 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,655 0 2 — — — — — — —
26 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,654 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,619 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,693 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2000 11–25 30.6% #112 1,517 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,447 0 2 — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jeff Tarango Diego Camacho
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1487 92.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.19
18 1987 1508 108.5 — — — — +34 — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1988 1598 124.9 — — — — +37 — — 51.4% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) 106.1 -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 1648 118.8 — — — — +7 — -102 46.4% -0.39 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 101.0 +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1990 1607 120.5 — — — — +6 -46 -69 42.0% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 98.7 +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1991 1613 132.3 -1.93 -1.26 0.892 48.2% +24 -37 — 41.8% -0.47 8–7 (53%) 7–8 (47%) 104.0 +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1992 1694 139.2 -0.84 +0.16 0.974 49.7% +28 -96 -139 50.4% +0.10 15–6 (71%) 10–14 (42%) 103.5 -1.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1993 1670 136.1 -1.01 -0.06 0.942 49.0% +18 -8 — 45.9% -0.28 12–6 (67%) 2–6 (25%) 102.6 -1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1994 1655 132.9 -1.13 +0.92 0.992 50.0% +24 -22 — 46.1% -0.03 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) 97.6 +1.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1995 1654 144.2 +0.56 -0.03 0.982 49.5% +7 -14 -104 43.3% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 7–10 (41%) 96.6 -1.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1996 1620 125.4 -0.16 +0.21 0.984 49.7% +74 -59 — 44.4% -0.35 4–7 (36%) 7–5 (58%) 97.6 +0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1997 1694 143.8 +0.74 +1.18 1.031 50.6% +30 -59 -135 52.9% +0.29 7–11 (39%) 11–12 (48%) 94.7 -1.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 1660 141.3 -0.44 +2.15 1.031 50.5% +49 -71 -90 47.8% -0.04 7–14 (33%) 7–12 (37%) 92.8 +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 1685 132.2 -2.40 -0.03 0.934 48.9% +15 -75 -110 46.4% -0.07 7–6 (54%) 6–6 (50%) 103.4 +1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 1517 123.9 -0.88 -1.79 0.903 48.4% -8 +82 +47 38.3% -0.57 3–10 (23%) 6–12 (33%) 88.3 -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 1453 110.6 -0.42 -1.74 0.824 46.7% +20 — — 25.0% -1.60 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 1447 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2009 1455 101.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1788 140.0 -0.70 +0.24 0.968 49.5% +26 -27 -95 45.8% -0.19 84–94 (47%) 79–102 (44%) 95.5 -0.38 — 1500 96.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +19.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.