H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jenson Brooksby vs Roberto Bautista Agut H2H: 1-2
Roberto Bautista Agut holds a 2–1 lead over Jenson Brooksby in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Roberto Bautista Agut leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Roberto Bautista Agut won the 2022 Canada Masters third round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 25
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Spain
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2022* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Roberto Bautista Agut | 7-5 6-1 | Jenson Brooksby | Match data |
| May 3, 2022* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Roberto Bautista Agut | 6-0 6-2 | Jenson Brooksby | Match data |
| Mar 28, 2022* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jenson Brooksby | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | Roberto Bautista Agut | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jenson Brooksby | #76 | #33 | 1,271 | 1,964 | 75 | 64 | 54.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Roberto Bautista Agut | #180 | #9 | 3,215 | 2,106 | 411 | 294 | 58.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jenson Brooksby | Roberto Bautista Agut | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #977 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #269 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #56 | 1,896 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2022 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #48 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #281 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #297 | 1,865 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2025 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #50 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2026 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #76 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #58 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #15 | 2,005 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 41–29 | 58.6% | #25 | 1,997 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,991 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #20 | 1,999 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,932 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #9 | 1,940 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,960 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #19 | 1,849 | 0 | 9 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #21 | 1,870 | 0 | 11 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #51 | 1,812 | 0 | 12 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #90 | 1,771 | 0 | 12 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #180 | 1,631 | 0 | 12 |