H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Jeremy Bates vs Mark Kratzmann H2H: 1-0

Jeremy Bates holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Kratzmann in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jeremy Bates leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jeremy Bates won the 1987 Hong Kong Open round of 32 2-6 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jeremy Bates
GBR Age 64 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Mark Kratzmann
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jeremy Bates #130 2-6 7-5 6-3 Mark Kratzmann #155 Match data Oct 29, 1987* R32 Hong Kong Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jeremy Bates #1,314 #54 700 1,717 117 175 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Mark Kratzmann #1,147 #50 557 1,751 60 96 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jeremy Bates Mark Kratzmann
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1982 0–3 0.0% — 1,453 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1983 1–3 25.0% #616 1,474 0 0
18 1980 0–1 0.0% #372 1,482 0 0 1984 2–6 25.0% #246 1,477 0 0
19 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,494 0 0 1985 4–3 57.1% #209 1,534 0 0
20 1982 0–2 0.0% — 1,470 0 0 1986 5–10 33.3% #142 1,545 0 0
21 1983 1–4 20.0% #329 1,466 0 0 1987 8–14 36.4% #182 1,543 0 0
22 1984 0–6 0.0% #185 1,397 0 0 1988 3–6 33.3% #150 1,540 0 0
23 1985 9–11 45.0% #99 1,479 0 0 1989 11–14 44.0% #122 1,604 0 0
24 1986 9–16 36.0% #187 1,513 0 0 1990 21–23 47.7% #75 1,623 0 0
25 1987 12–10 54.5% #89 1,644 0 0 1991 5–13 27.8% #208 1,539 0 0
26 1988 15–19 44.1% #152 1,622 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #572 1,528 0 0
27 1989 13–12 52.0% #96 1,659 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1990 6–18 25.0% #126 1,529 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1991 4–5 44.4% #168 1,571 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 1992 7–12 36.8% #105 1,582 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 1993 12–17 41.4% #98 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 1994 16–16 50.0% #77 1,618 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 1995 12–22 35.3% #143 1,522 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 1996 0–3 0.0% #600 1,485 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jeremy Bates Mark Kratzmann
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1981 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
21 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1988 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1985 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 9 11 20 45.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
24 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1990 11 15 26 42.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 1987 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 1 8 9 11.1% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1988 8 12 20 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1989 9 9 18 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1990 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1992 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1993 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1994 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1995 6 11 17 35.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1996 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 58 80 138 42.0% 8 21 29 27.6% 34 44 78 43.6% 17 30 47 36.2% — 27 52 79 34.2% 1 9 10 10.0% 25 24 49 51.0% 7 11 18 38.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jeremy Bates Mark Kratzmann
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1454 97.6 — — — — — — +22 30.0% -1.60 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.29
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1475 108.3 — — — — — — +37 41.7% -0.67 0–1 1–0 — -0.16
18 1980 1482 97.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.25 1984 1477 107.1 — — — — — — +37 33.3% -0.83 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.06
19 1981 1495 98.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.00 — — — +0.12 1985 1535 111.3 — — — — -40 — +64 53.3% +0.13 1–0 1–1 — +0.60
20 1982 1470 96.1 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.50 0–1 — — +0.09 1986 1546 125.6 — — — — -44 -64 +92 42.6% -0.30 2–5 (29%) 3–2 (60%) 98.5 +0.02
21 1983 1467 110.8 — — — — — — — 18.2% -1.91 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.21 1987 1543 116.1 — — — — -70 -95 +168 40.7% -0.76 4–4 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 102.8 +0.07
22 1984 1398 90.5 — — — — — — +36 13.3% -2.33 0–2 1–1 — +0.70 1988 1541 105.8 — — — — -52 — — 33.3% -0.96 1–0 2–3 (40%) — +0.35
23 1985 1480 114.0 — — — — +93 — -61 46.8% -0.26 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) 99.1 +1.57 1989 1605 130.8 — — — — -25 — +108 47.2% -0.24 3–8 (27%) 11–7 (61%) 101.0 -1.10
24 1986 1514 122.4 — — — — +60 -52 -37 44.6% -0.57 2–8 (20%) 6–4 (60%) 99.4 +0.61 1990 1624 128.1 — — — — +17 — +93 44.6% -0.55 11–7 (61%) 7–8 (47%) 103.8 -0.25
25 1987 1645 121.6 — — — — -16 — -76 51.7% +0.21 6–3 (67%) 4–5 (44%) 105.1 +0.46 1991 1539 113.9 -0.13 -3.85 0.855 47.8% +3 — +151 35.4% -0.92 3–6 (33%) 6–8 (43%) 95.6 +0.30
26 1988 1623 121.3 — — — — -11 -108 -55 41.7% -0.74 10–5 (67%) 6–7 (46%) 105.6 +0.50 1992 1529 103.1 -0.28 -0.21 0.785 46.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.07
27 1989 1659 123.3 — — — — -14 -100 -69 52.3% -0.03 2–2 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 103.3 +1.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1990 1529 118.0 — — — — +33 — +70 33.9% -0.97 2–6 (25%) 4–6 (40%) 95.2 -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1991 1572 117.8 +0.31 +0.02 0.958 49.0% -15 — +54 45.8% -0.50 1–1 3–1 (75%) — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1992 1582 113.5 -1.79 -1.18 0.850 47.0% -68 — +93 43.8% -0.58 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 100.1 +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1993 1595 125.5 -2.87 +0.17 0.884 47.4% -23 — +86 38.8% -0.60 4–1 (80%) 2–5 (29%) 102.6 +0.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1994 1618 127.5 -0.88 -2.29 0.893 48.2% -29 — +141 52.4% -0.13 5–7 (42%) 7–5 (58%) 101.2 +1.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1995 1523 122.8 -4.22 -1.39 0.847 46.5% +33 — +186 33.3% -1.05 5–2 (71%) 7–8 (47%) 105.0 +1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1996 1485 94.4 -1.81 -0.66 0.757 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1718 125.6 -2.36 -1.12 0.872 47.3% +3 -78 +30 42.1% -0.60 42–45 (48%) 53–55 (49%) 104.9 +2.93 — 1752 126.5 -0.14 -3.62 0.850 47.7% -15 -77 +101 41.8% -0.59 25–36 (41%) 37–38 (49%) 99.7 -0.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.