H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Jeremy Bates vs Martin Damm Sr H2H: 1-2

Martin Damm Sr holds a 2–1 lead over Jeremy Bates in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Martin Damm Sr leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Martin Damm Sr won the 1994 Ostrava quarterfinal 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jeremy Bates
GBR Age 64 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Martin Damm Sr
CZE

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martin Damm Sr 6-2 6-3 Jeremy Bates #92 Match data Oct 15, 1994* QF Ostrava ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Martin Damm Sr 7-5 3-6 6-3 Jeremy Bates #136 Match data Aug 18, 1993* R64 New Haven ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Jeremy Bates #86 6-1 7-5 Martin Damm Sr Match data Apr 1, 1993* R32 Osaka ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jeremy Bates #1,314 #54 700 1,717 117 175 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Martin Damm Sr — — — 1,731 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Jeremy Bates Martin Damm Sr
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1980 0–1 0.0% #372 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
1982 0–2 0.0% — 1,470 0 0 — — — — — — —
1983 1–4 20.0% #329 1,466 0 0 — — — — — — —
1984 0–6 0.0% #185 1,397 0 0 — — — — — — —
1985 9–11 45.0% #99 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
1986 9–16 36.0% #187 1,513 0 0 — — — — — — —
1987 12–10 54.5% #89 1,644 0 0 — — — — — — —
1988 15–19 44.1% #152 1,622 0 0 — — — — — — —
1989 13–12 52.0% #96 1,659 0 0 — — — — — — —
1990 6–18 25.0% #126 1,529 0 0 — — — — — — —
1991 4–5 44.4% #168 1,571 0 0 — — — — — — —
1992 7–12 36.8% #105 1,582 0 0 — — — — — — —
1993 12–17 41.4% #98 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
1994 16–16 50.0% #77 1,618 0 1 — — — — — — —
1995 12–22 35.3% #143 1,522 0 1 — — — — — — —
1996 0–3 0.0% #600 1,485 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Jeremy Bates Martin Damm Sr
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1981 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1991 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 6 8 14 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1993 7 11 18 38.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
1985 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 7 12 19 36.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
1986 2 5 7 28.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1995 7 13 20 35.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
1987 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 15 13 28 53.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5%
1988 8 12 20 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1997 10 13 23 43.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
1989 9 9 18 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1998 10 14 24 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
1990 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1999 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
1992 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
1993 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1994 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1995 6 11 17 35.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1996 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 58 80 138 42.0% 8 21 29 27.6% 34 44 78 43.6% 17 30 47 36.2% Career 74 107 181 40.9% 6 28 34 17.6% 22 24 46 47.8% 51 49 100 51.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Jeremy Bates Martin Damm Sr
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1980 1482 97.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.25 1989 1492 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.08
1981 1495 98.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.00 — — — +0.12 1990 1478 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.15
1982 1470 96.1 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.50 0–1 — — +0.09 1991 1504 104.7 — — — — +57 — — 57.1% +0.57 1–0 0–1 — +0.21
1983 1467 110.8 — — — — — — — 18.2% -1.91 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.21 1992 1546 125.4 — — — — +65 -88 — 35.1% -0.91 4–1 (80%) 2–5 (29%) 103.3 +0.26
1984 1398 90.5 — — — — — — +36 13.3% -2.33 0–2 1–1 — +0.70 1993 1647 128.4 — — — — +28 -196 — 44.8% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 +0.61
1985 1480 114.0 — — — — +93 — -61 46.8% -0.26 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) 99.1 +1.57 1994 1630 133.5 — — — — -23 -172 +21 44.4% -0.32 3–13 (19%) 9–10 (47%) 92.4 -0.61
1986 1514 122.4 — — — — +60 -52 -37 44.6% -0.57 2–8 (20%) 6–4 (60%) 99.4 +0.61 1995 1619 133.0 — — — — +8 — — 42.3% -0.55 9–8 (53%) 11–11 (50%) 102.9 -0.27
1987 1645 121.6 — — — — -17 — -76 51.7% +0.21 6–3 (67%) 4–5 (44%) 105.1 +0.46 1996 1709 139.5 — — — — +35 — -23 47.9% -0.08 13–8 (62%) 13–18 (42%) 102.9 +1.26
1988 1623 121.3 — — — — -11 -108 -55 41.7% -0.74 10–5 (67%) 6–7 (46%) 105.6 +0.50 1997 1694 135.4 — — — — +35 -281 +7 48.3% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 16–10 (62%) 105.2 +0.62
1989 1659 123.3 — — — — -14 -100 -69 52.3% -0.03 2–2 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 103.3 +1.18 1998 1649 132.2 — — — — +16 — +23 42.9% -0.50 7–7 (50%) 8–11 (42%) 98.6 -0.31
1990 1529 118.0 — — — — +33 — +70 33.9% -0.97 2–6 (25%) 4–6 (40%) 95.2 -0.28 1999 1578 123.5 — — — — +27 -177 +52 39.1% -0.78 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) 90.9 -0.57
1991 1572 117.8 +0.31 +0.02 0.958 49.0% -15 — +54 45.8% -0.50 1–1 3–1 (75%) — -0.30 2000 1615 127.5 — — — — -72 -159 +102 44.2% -0.34 7–3 (70%) 6–9 (40%) 105.2 +0.30
1992 1582 113.5 -1.79 -1.18 0.850 47.0% -68 — +93 43.8% -0.58 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 100.1 +0.12 2001 1514 96.3 — — — — — — +91 15.0% -1.90 — 0–2 — +0.77
1993 1595 125.5 -2.87 +0.17 0.884 47.4% -23 — +86 38.8% -0.60 4–1 (80%) 2–5 (29%) 102.6 +0.79 2002 1525 111.4 — — — — +15 — — 37.5% -0.75 — 1–1 — -0.13
1994 1618 127.5 -0.88 -2.29 0.893 48.2% -29 — +141 52.4% -0.13 5–7 (42%) 7–5 (58%) 101.2 +1.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1995 1523 122.8 -4.22 -1.39 0.847 46.5% +33 — +186 33.3% -1.05 5–2 (71%) 7–8 (47%) 105.0 +1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1996 1485 94.4 -1.81 -0.66 0.757 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1718 125.6 -2.36 -1.12 0.872 47.3% +3 -78 +30 42.1% -0.60 42–45 (48%) 53–55 (49%) 104.9 +2.93 Career 1732 136.6 — — — — +17 -170 +36 43.3% -0.43 59–60 (50%) 77–88 (47%) 101.6 +0.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.