Jerome Golmard
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Henman | 3 | 5 | 8 | Sep 3, 2004 | H2H |
| Alex Corretja | 2 | 5 | 7 | Sep 27, 2002 | H2H |
| Karol Kucera | 4 | 1 | 5 | Sep 26, 2002 | H2H |
| Thomas Enqvist | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 4, 2002 | H2H |
| Tommy Haas | 1 | 4 | 5 | Oct 11, 2001 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC
Jerome Golmard and Cedric Pioline are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jerome Golmard won the 2001 Miami Open round of 64 7-5 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerome Golmard | 7-5 7-6(3) | Cedric Pioline | Match data | Mar 21, 2001* | R64 | Miami Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
| Cedric Pioline | 6-3 6-4 | Jerome Golmard | Match data | Feb 19, 2000* | SF | ABN AMRO Open | ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerome Golmard | #1,178 | #22 | 1,494 | 1,884 | 141 | 142 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Cedric Pioline | #750 | #5 | 2,335 | 1,984 | 370 | 301 | 55.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jerome Golmard | Cedric Pioline | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #88 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #143 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #51 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #33 | 1,849 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #47 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 51–27 | 65.4% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #35 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #50 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #99 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #18 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #211 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #13 | 1,796 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #16 | 1,763 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #84 | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #119 | 1,619 | 0 | 5 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jerome Golmard | Cedric Pioline | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 20 | 1994 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1990 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 1996 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 8 | 8 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1991 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 23 | 1997 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1992 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% |
| 24 | 1998 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1993 | 19 | 9 | 28 | 67.9% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% |
| 25 | 1999 | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1994 | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% |
| 26 | 2000 | 23 | 13 | 36 | 63.9% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1995 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% |
| 27 | 2001 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 16 | 8 | 24 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1996 | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% |
| 28 | 2002 | 14 | 9 | 23 | 60.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% |
| 29 | 2003 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% |
| 30 | 2004 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 20 | 16 | 36 | 55.6% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 12 | 2 | 14 | 85.7% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 16 | 10 | 26 | 61.5% | 13 | 3 | 16 | 81.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 85 | 70 | 155 | 54.8% | 32 | 40 | 72 | 44.4% | 15 | 17 | 32 | 46.9% | 9 | 15 | 24 | 37.5% | — | 146 | 118 | 264 | 55.3% | 109 | 93 | 202 | 54.0% | 46 | 29 | 75 | 61.3% | 69 | 61 | 130 | 53.1% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 242/283 of Jerome Golmard's and 560/651 of Cedric Pioline's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jerome Golmard | Cedric Pioline | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | 1994 | 2/2 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 54.9% | 67.2% | 58.0% | 61.1% | 41.7% | 62.7% | 35.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 16/17 | 5.1 | 5.4 | 54.3% | 68.1% | 47.0% | 54.9% | 35.2% | 58.3% | 32.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 12/17 | 3.9 | 5.4 | 58.8% | 67.5% | 39.3% | 43.9% | 25.7% | 55.9% | 30.3% | 1991 | 40/41 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 59.0% | 68.7% | 51.3% | 60.4% | 46.4% | 61.6% | 38.4% |
| 23 | 1997 | 23/28 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 57.9% | 69.5% | 50.8% | 54.4% | 41.0% | 61.4% | 33.5% | 1992 | 53/58 | 5.8 | 3.7 | 57.0% | 74.5% | 46.4% | 59.3% | 41.4% | 62.6% | 36.9% |
| 24 | 1998 | 40/45 | 5.1 | 4.1 | 62.3% | 69.2% | 51.2% | 63.2% | 44.9% | 62.2% | 36.4% | 1993 | 68/78 | 5.7 | 3.0 | 59.8% | 73.8% | 52.0% | 60.8% | 40.6% | 65.1% | 39.4% |
| 25 | 1999 | 29/33 | 5.1 | 2.7 | 57.9% | 72.8% | 53.3% | 54.9% | 44.1% | 64.3% | 37.8% | 1994 | 44/57 | 4.5 | 3.3 | 60.1% | 70.1% | 48.9% | 53.4% | 42.1% | 61.7% | 39.9% |
| 26 | 2000 | 45/54 | 6.4 | 3.4 | 56.6% | 71.0% | 53.7% | 55.3% | 38.7% | 63.2% | 35.2% | 1995 | 44/51 | 4.9 | 3.8 | 57.9% | 72.7% | 48.2% | 53.6% | 37.8% | 62.4% | 37.6% |
| 27 | 2001 | 42/48 | 5.4 | 3.2 | 60.3% | 71.8% | 49.2% | 53.8% | 46.7% | 62.9% | 38.4% | 1996 | 53/59 | 6.0 | 3.2 | 55.9% | 75.1% | 51.7% | 62.1% | 44.4% | 64.9% | 39.6% |
| 28 | 2002 | 21/27 | 6.9 | 4.0 | 61.4% | 77.0% | 51.6% | 51.5% | 35.9% | 66.9% | 38.2% | 1997 | 51/62 | 5.9 | 3.5 | 60.9% | 73.7% | 51.1% | 61.5% | 42.4% | 64.7% | 38.6% |
| 29 | 2003 | 3/3 | 2.7 | 6.7 | 53.2% | 74.7% | 62.6% | 51.2% | 87.5% | 69.1% | 30.6% | 1998 | 56/64 | 5.4 | 3.3 | 58.6% | 73.5% | 50.4% | 59.3% | 47.1% | 63.8% | 38.3% |
| 30 | 2004 | 9/9 | 8.0 | 4.3 | 56.4% | 73.1% | 51.8% | 42.1% | 45.8% | 63.8% | 34.6% | 1999 | 54/65 | 6.0 | 4.6 | 54.4% | 75.4% | 49.2% | 62.1% | 42.4% | 63.4% | 36.2% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 46/51 | 8.2 | 4.8 | 52.7% | 78.8% | 51.3% | 60.8% | 41.8% | 65.5% | 39.5% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 31/39 | 8.3 | 4.6 | 52.5% | 73.2% | 51.4% | 63.6% | 40.7% | 63.1% | 36.9% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 20/26 | 5.7 | 4.4 | 51.2% | 71.3% | 48.3% | 45.7% | 32.5% | 60.3% | 33.6% |
| Career | — | 242/283 | 5.5 | 3.8 | 58.8% | 71.2% | 50.9% | 54.8% | 41.8% | 62.7% | 35.9% | — | 560/671 | 5.8 | 3.7 | 57.1% | 73.7% | 50.1% | 59.3% | 42.2% | 63.5% | 38.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jerome Golmard | Cedric Pioline | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 20 | 1994 | 1514 | 111.9 | +2.11 | -0.88 | 0.946 | 49.6% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.17 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.06 | 1989 | 1483 | 114.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +7 | — | 12.5% | -1.88 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.41 |
| 21 | 1995 | 1550 | 131.8 | -1.50 | -2.68 | 0.777 | 45.9% | +22 | +6 | — | 40.0% | -0.80 | 2–4 (33%) | 6–1 (86%) | — | +0.02 | 1990 | 1484 | 124.4 | — | — | — | — | +14 | +43 | — | 34.9% | -0.47 | 4–4 (50%) | 2–5 (29%) | — | +0.10 |
| 22 | 1996 | 1425 | 100.2 | -4.28 | -4.47 | 0.687 | 44.2% | +138 | +11 | — | 29.5% | -1.25 | 1–5 (17%) | 0–1 | — | +1.31 | 1991 | 1665 | 135.0 | +1.05 | -0.51 | 1.002 | 50.2% | -79 | -6 | — | 50.5% | +0.06 | 8–8 (50%) | 6–11 (35%) | — | -0.32 |
| 23 | 1997 | 1547 | 122.9 | -0.42 | -3.18 | 0.869 | 47.8% | +25 | -86 | +102 | 46.4% | -0.23 | 5–4 (56%) | 4–6 (40%) | — | +0.72 | 1992 | 1849 | 149.9 | +1.29 | -1.12 | 0.985 | 50.1% | -31 | -113 | -257 | 52.3% | +0.22 | 10–11 (48%) | 10–13 (43%) | — | -1.91 |
| 24 | 1998 | 1718 | 137.1 | +0.32 | -1.03 | 0.965 | 49.6% | -39 | -228 | +12 | 54.7% | +0.22 | 6–8 (43%) | 9–9 (50%) | — | -1.08 | 1993 | 1937 | 156.7 | +3.18 | +1.96 | 1.128 | 52.1% | +8 | -173 | -173 | 60.8% | +0.75 | 16–11 (59%) | 19–19 (50%) | — | -4.16 |
| 25 | 1999 | 1843 | 150.8 | +3.05 | +0.79 | 1.059 | 50.9% | -30 | -209 | — | 64.2% | +0.94 | 5–3 (63%) | 9–6 (60%) | — | -1.75 | 1994 | 1768 | 141.9 | +0.19 | +1.74 | 1.042 | 50.9% | +34 | -22 | -59 | 51.3% | +0.05 | 12–15 (44%) | 11–8 (58%) | — | -0.27 |
| 26 | 2000 | 1757 | 145.2 | +0.97 | -1.36 | 0.957 | 49.3% | +32 | -125 | -46 | 55.6% | +0.36 | 9–5 (64%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | -0.62 | 1995 | 1762 | 147.6 | +1.13 | +0.42 | 1.001 | 49.8% | -23 | +16 | +10 | 50.8% | -0.06 | 4–9 (31%) | 12–7 (63%) | — | -3.16 |
| 27 | 2001 | 1747 | 137.2 | +1.00 | +0.19 | 1.035 | 50.7% | +8 | -18 | -101 | 57.7% | +0.57 | 7–7 (50%) | 7–12 (37%) | — | +0.06 | 1996 | 1809 | 154.8 | +2.69 | +2.35 | 1.129 | 52.1% | -33 | +87 | +32 | 63.1% | +0.93 | 8–8 (50%) | 10–6 (63%) | — | -1.10 |
| 28 | 2002 | 1700 | 136.6 | +2.40 | +0.61 | 1.153 | 52.2% | +64 | — | — | 56.1% | +0.12 | 2–5 (29%) | 8–2 (80%) | — | +0.65 | 1997 | 1832 | 150.4 | +2.57 | +1.89 | 1.093 | 51.3% | -28 | +52 | +117 | 57.1% | +0.51 | 14–11 (56%) | 9–10 (47%) | — | -2.00 |
| 29 | 2003 | 1628 | 97.6 | +2.49 | -4.05 | 0.991 | 45.5% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -2.50 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.20 | 1998 | 1765 | 148.9 | +1.69 | +0.86 | 1.058 | 51.0% | +5 | +162 | +116 | 56.6% | +0.30 | 12–10 (55%) | 15–14 (52%) | — | -0.97 |
| 30 | 2004 | 1661 | 113.6 | -0.53 | -2.50 | 0.955 | 49.2% | +96 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.40 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.70 | 1999 | 1797 | 143.0 | +1.68 | -0.71 | 0.989 | 50.0% | -26 | -11 | +162 | 55.2% | +0.07 | 9–13 (41%) | 25–10 (71%) | — | -2.23 |
| 31 | 2005 | 1610 | 91.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1764 | 148.1 | +2.89 | +1.87 | 1.144 | 52.4% | -10 | +168 | +138 | 60.6% | +0.75 | 8–9 (47%) | 15–13 (54%) | — | +0.89 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1658 | 131.9 | +0.83 | -1.42 | 0.999 | 50.1% | +19 | +151 | +176 | 46.7% | -0.27 | 6–8 (43%) | 12–9 (57%) | — | -0.75 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1620 | 134.1 | -0.60 | -1.51 | 0.847 | 46.8% | +33 | +134 | +147 | 35.1% | -0.91 | 3–5 (38%) | 3–7 (30%) | — | -2.76 |
| Career | — | 1885 | 140.8 | +0.66 | -1.09 | 0.961 | 49.4% | +20 | -84 | +6 | 52.5% | +0.11 | 39–44 (47%) | 56–47 (54%) | 104.6 | +0.05 | — | 1984 | 152.3 | +1.77 | +0.70 | 1.047 | 50.8% | -10 | +32 | +46 | 54.2% | +0.27 | 114–123 (48%) | 149–132 (53%) | 98.5 | -2.84 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Henman | 3 | 5 | 8 | Sep 3, 2004 | H2H |
| Alex Corretja | 2 | 5 | 7 | Sep 27, 2002 | H2H |
| Karol Kucera | 4 | 1 | 5 | Sep 26, 2002 | H2H |
| Thomas Enqvist | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 4, 2002 | H2H |
| Tommy Haas | 1 | 4 | 5 | Oct 11, 2001 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 2 | 11 | 13 | Feb 17, 2001 | H2H |
| Todd Martin | 4 | 6 | 10 | Jan 21, 2001 | H2H |
| Andrei Medvedev | 7 | 2 | 9 | Apr 25, 2001 | H2H |
| Marc Rosset | 3 | 6 | 9 | Nov 16, 2000 | H2H |
| Martin Damm Sr | 7 | 2 | 9 | Jun 23, 1999 | — |