H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jerome Golmard vs Galo Blanco H2H: 1-1
Jerome Golmard and Galo Blanco are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Galo Blanco leads 1–0 on clay, while Jerome Golmard leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Galo Blanco won the 2002 Vina Del Mar third round 7-6(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2002* | Vina Del Mar | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Galo Blanco | 7-6(3) 6-4 | Jerome Golmard | Match data |
| Aug 17, 2000* | Washington | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jerome Golmard | 7-5 6-3 | Galo Blanco | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerome Golmard | #1,178 | #22 | 1,494 | 1,896 | 141 | 142 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Galo Blanco | #809 | #40 | 963 | 1,750 | 122 | 175 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jerome Golmard | Galo Blanco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #164 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #88 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #82 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #143 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #75 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #47 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #56 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #35 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #134 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #99 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #50 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #174 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #99 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #822 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #211 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |