H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jerome Golmard vs Goran Ivanisevic H2H: 1-2
Goran Ivanisevic holds a 2–1 lead over Jerome Golmard in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Goran Ivanisevic leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jerome Golmard won the 2002 Australian Open second round 6-3 7-6(2) 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 54
Left-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2002* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Jerome Golmard | 6-3 7-6(2) 5-7 6-4 | Goran Ivanisevic | Match data |
| Nov 13, 1998* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Goran Ivanisevic | 6-3 3-2 (ret.) | Jerome Golmard | Match data |
| Jun 14, 1997* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Goran Ivanisevic | 6-3 7-6(9) | Jerome Golmard | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerome Golmard | #1,178 | #22 | 1,494 | 1,896 | 141 | 142 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Goran Ivanisevic | #395 | #2 | 3,572 | 2,124 | 561 | 316 | 64.0% | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jerome Golmard | Goran Ivanisevic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #371 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #40 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,921 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,922 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 57–18 | 76.0% | #4 | 2,090 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 1995 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #88 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #7 | 2,031 | 0 | 9 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #143 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 62–26 | 70.5% | #5 | 1,976 | 0 | 11 |
| 23 | 1997 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #10 | 1,911 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #47 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 76–24 | 76.0% | #4 | 2,001 | 0 | 17 |
| 25 | 1999 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #35 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #15 | 1,866 | 0 | 20 |
| 26 | 2000 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 44–28 | 61.1% | #12 | 1,873 | 0 | 21 |
| 27 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #50 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,713 | 0 | 21 |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #99 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #129 | 1,596 | 0 | 21 |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #12 | 1,814 | 1 | 22 |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #211 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #243 | 1,698 | 1 | 22 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #657 | 1,646 | 1 | 22 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #266 | 1,632 | 1 | 22 |