H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Jerome Golmard vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 1-1
Jerome Golmard and Hicham Arazi are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Hicham Arazi leads 1–0 on clay, while Jerome Golmard leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jerome Golmard won the 1997 US Open first round 6-4 1-6 7-6(4) 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
MAR
Age 52
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 1997* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jerome Golmard | 6-4 1-6 7-6(4) 4-6 7-5 | Hicham Arazi | Match data |
| Sep 26, 1996* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Hicham Arazi | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Jerome Golmard | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerome Golmard | #1,178 | #22 | 1,494 | 1,896 | 141 | 142 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Hicham Arazi | #793 | #22 | 1,240 | 1,864 | 202 | 213 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jerome Golmard | Hicham Arazi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #88 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #141 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #143 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #38 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #47 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #35 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #30 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #50 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #99 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #52 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #211 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #62 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |