H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jerome Golmard vs Jaime Yzaga H2H: 0-1
Jaime Yzaga holds a 1–0 lead over Jerome Golmard in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jaime Yzaga leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jaime Yzaga won the 1995 Toulouse third round 6-4 6-7(1) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 1995* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jaime Yzaga | 6-4 6-7(1) 6-4 | Jerome Golmard | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerome Golmard | #1,178 | #22 | 1,494 | 1,896 | 141 | 142 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,870 | 238 | 205 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jerome Golmard | Jaime Yzaga | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1995 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #88 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #143 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1997 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #47 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1999 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #35 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2000 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,726 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #50 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,613 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #99 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,608 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #211 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |