H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Jerome Golmard vs Jan-Michael Gambill H2H: 1-0
Jerome Golmard holds a 1–0 lead over Jan-Michael Gambill in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jerome Golmard leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jerome Golmard won the 2002 Washington second round 7-6(1) 1-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2002* | Washington | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Jerome Golmard | 7-6(1) 1-6 6-4 | Jan-Michael Gambill | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerome Golmard | #1,178 | #22 | 1,494 | 1,896 | 141 | 142 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jan-Michael Gambill | #1,352 | #14 | 1,655 | 1,956 | 201 | 191 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jerome Golmard | Jan-Michael Gambill | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #88 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #143 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #33 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #47 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1999 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #35 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2000 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,642 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #50 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #99 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #687 | 1,567 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #211 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,503 | 0 | 3 |