H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jerome Golmard vs Jan Vacek H2H: 0-1
Jan Vacek holds a 1–0 lead over Jerome Golmard in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan Vacek leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jan Vacek won the 2002 Wimbledon first round 6-2 7-6(6) 3-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 50
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2004* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Q3 | Hard | Jerome Golmard | 6-3 6-2 | Jan Vacek | Match data |
| Jun 26, 2002* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Jan Vacek | 6-2 7-6(6) 3-2 (ret.) | Jerome Golmard | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerome Golmard | #1,178 | #22 | 1,494 | 1,896 | 141 | 142 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jan Vacek | #1,155 | #61 | 646 | 1,640 | 30 | 59 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jerome Golmard | Jan Vacek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #88 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #143 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1997 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #47 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1999 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #35 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 10–24 | 29.4% | #110 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #50 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #129 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #99 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #176 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,463 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #211 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #298 | 1,490 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #235 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #563 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |