H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jerome Golmard vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 1-0

Jerome Golmard holds a 1–0 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jerome Golmard leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jerome Golmard won the 1998 Italian Open round of 64 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jerome Golmard
FRA Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jerome Golmard #84 6-4 6-1 Jeff Tarango #47 Match data May 13, 1998* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jerome Golmard #1,178 #22 1,494 1,884 141 142 49.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,788 240 294 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jerome Golmard Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1994 1–1 50.0% #208 1,514 0 0 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1995 6–11 35.3% #88 1,549 0 0 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,607 0 0
22 1996 3–14 17.6% #143 1,424 0 0 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,613 0 0
23 1997 12–16 42.9% #115 1,547 0 0 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1998 23–22 51.1% #47 1,717 0 0 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1999 21–12 63.6% #35 1,842 0 1 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,655 0 2
26 2000 30–24 55.6% #42 1,756 0 2 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,654 0 2
27 2001 27–21 56.2% #50 1,746 0 2 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,619 0 2
28 2002 14–13 51.9% #99 1,699 0 2 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,693 0 2
29 2003 0–3 0.0% #309 1,628 0 2 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 2004 4–5 44.4% #211 1,660 0 2 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2000 11–25 30.6% #112 1,517 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,447 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jerome Golmard Jeff Tarango
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1994 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1995 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1996 2 2 4 50.0% 0 8 8 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1991 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1997 5 9 14 35.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1992 17 11 28 60.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
24 1998 11 11 22 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1993 14 16 30 46.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1999 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 18 18 36 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
26 2000 23 13 36 63.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1995 7 14 21 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 2001 9 9 18 50.0% 16 8 24 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1996 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
28 2002 14 9 23 60.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1997 20 13 33 60.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
29 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 19 18 37 51.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2004 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1999 6 11 17 35.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 2 14 16 12.5% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 85 70 155 54.8% 32 40 72 44.4% 15 17 32 46.9% 9 15 24 37.5% — 146 167 313 46.6% 49 59 108 45.4% 14 27 41 34.1% 31 41 72 43.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 242/283 of Jerome Golmard's and 411/468 of Jeff Tarango's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jerome Golmard Jeff Tarango
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1994 2/2 3.0 3.5 54.9% 67.2% 58.0% 61.1% 41.7% 62.7% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 16/17 5.1 5.4 54.3% 68.1% 47.0% 54.9% 35.2% 58.3% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1996 12/17 3.9 5.4 58.8% 67.5% 39.3% 43.9% 25.7% 55.9% 30.3% 1991 32/39 1.9 5.1 65.8% 64.8% 46.6% 56.0% 48.7% 58.5% 37.0%
23 1997 23/28 4.1 4.0 57.9% 69.5% 50.8% 54.4% 41.0% 61.4% 33.5% 1992 47/52 3.5 3.5 63.1% 67.5% 47.8% 56.6% 42.3% 60.3% 38.7%
24 1998 40/45 5.1 4.1 62.3% 69.2% 51.2% 63.2% 44.9% 62.2% 36.4% 1993 43/50 3.7 4.6 56.6% 68.4% 47.0% 59.2% 45.1% 59.1% 38.5%
25 1999 29/33 5.1 2.7 57.9% 72.8% 53.3% 54.9% 44.1% 64.3% 37.8% 1994 40/50 3.6 2.2 62.1% 65.8% 51.8% 56.4% 46.6% 60.6% 39.0%
26 2000 45/54 6.4 3.4 56.6% 71.0% 53.7% 55.3% 38.7% 63.2% 35.2% 1995 38/42 4.2 3.7 62.9% 70.3% 49.3% 54.4% 44.8% 62.3% 37.0%
27 2001 42/48 5.4 3.2 60.3% 71.8% 49.2% 53.8% 46.7% 62.9% 38.4% 1996 28/32 5.2 3.2 61.9% 68.0% 50.2% 54.3% 39.3% 61.4% 38.0%
28 2002 21/27 6.9 4.0 61.4% 77.0% 51.6% 51.5% 35.9% 66.9% 38.2% 1997 54/60 3.8 3.5 62.3% 69.2% 51.5% 52.2% 45.0% 62.3% 38.9%
29 2003 3/3 2.7 6.7 53.2% 74.7% 62.6% 51.2% 87.5% 69.1% 30.6% 1998 47/53 4.0 4.2 57.7% 67.9% 52.0% 51.3% 46.8% 61.1% 40.1%
30 2004 9/9 8.0 4.3 56.4% 73.1% 51.8% 42.1% 45.8% 63.8% 34.6% 1999 42/45 4.9 4.1 60.6% 67.1% 46.1% 61.0% 43.2% 58.9% 38.4%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 33/36 4.6 5.3 58.1% 68.9% 47.5% 56.9% 42.2% 60.1% 36.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 7/9 3.3 2.1 62.4% 61.8% 52.7% 53.7% 51.2% 58.4% 34.3%
Career — 242/283 5.5 3.8 58.8% 71.2% 50.9% 54.8% 41.8% 62.7% 35.9% — 411/534 3.9 3.9 61.0% 67.8% 49.2% 55.7% 44.6% 60.5% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jerome Golmard Jeff Tarango
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1508 108.5 — — — — +34 — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.19
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1598 124.9 — — — — +37 — — 51.4% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) — -0.05
20 1994 1514 111.9 +2.11 -0.88 0.946 49.6% — — — 50.0% +0.17 1–1 1–1 — -0.06 1989 1648 118.8 — — — — +7 — -102 46.4% -0.39 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12
21 1995 1550 131.8 -1.50 -2.68 0.777 45.9% +22 +6 — 40.0% -0.80 2–4 (33%) 6–1 (86%) — +0.02 1990 1607 120.5 — — — — +6 -46 -69 42.0% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.35
22 1996 1425 100.2 -4.28 -4.47 0.687 44.2% +138 +11 — 29.5% -1.25 1–5 (17%) 0–1 — +1.31 1991 1613 132.3 -1.93 -1.26 0.892 48.2% +24 -37 — 41.8% -0.47 8–7 (53%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.07
23 1997 1547 122.9 -0.42 -3.18 0.869 47.8% +25 -86 +102 46.4% -0.23 5–4 (56%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.72 1992 1694 139.2 -0.84 +0.16 0.974 49.7% +28 -96 -139 50.4% +0.10 15–6 (71%) 10–14 (42%) — -1.21
24 1998 1718 137.1 +0.32 -1.03 0.965 49.6% -39 -228 +12 54.7% +0.22 6–8 (43%) 9–9 (50%) — -1.08 1993 1670 136.1 -1.01 -0.06 0.942 49.0% +18 -8 — 45.9% -0.28 12–6 (67%) 2–6 (25%) — -1.60
25 1999 1843 150.8 +3.05 +0.79 1.059 50.9% -30 -209 — 64.2% +0.94 5–3 (63%) 9–6 (60%) — -1.75 1994 1655 132.9 -1.13 +0.92 0.992 50.0% +24 -22 — 46.1% -0.03 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.47
26 2000 1757 145.2 +0.97 -1.36 0.957 49.3% +32 -125 -46 55.6% +0.36 9–5 (64%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.62 1995 1654 144.2 +0.56 -0.03 0.982 49.5% +7 -14 -104 43.3% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.34
27 2001 1747 137.2 +1.00 +0.19 1.035 50.7% +8 -18 -101 57.7% +0.57 7–7 (50%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.06 1996 1620 125.4 -0.16 +0.21 0.984 49.7% +74 -59 — 44.4% -0.35 4–7 (36%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.93
28 2002 1700 136.6 +2.40 +0.61 1.153 52.2% +64 — — 56.1% +0.12 2–5 (29%) 8–2 (80%) — +0.65 1997 1694 143.8 +0.74 +1.18 1.031 50.6% +30 -59 -135 52.9% +0.29 7–11 (39%) 11–12 (48%) — -1.45
29 2003 1628 97.6 +2.49 -4.05 0.991 45.5% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.20 1998 1660 141.3 -0.44 +2.15 1.031 50.5% +49 -71 -90 47.8% -0.04 7–14 (33%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.03
30 2004 1661 113.6 -0.53 -2.50 0.955 49.2% +96 — — 50.0% -0.40 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.70 1999 1685 132.2 -2.40 -0.03 0.934 48.9% +15 -75 -110 46.4% -0.07 7–6 (54%) 6–6 (50%) — +1.16
31 2005 1610 91.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1517 123.9 -0.88 -1.79 0.903 48.4% -8 +82 +47 38.3% -0.57 3–10 (23%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.28
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1453 110.6 -0.42 -1.74 0.824 46.7% +20 — — 25.0% -1.60 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.01
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1447 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.06
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1455 101.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1885 140.8 +0.66 -1.09 0.961 49.4% +20 -84 +6 52.5% +0.11 39–44 (47%) 56–47 (54%) 104.6 +0.05 — 1788 140.0 -0.70 +0.24 0.968 49.5% +26 -27 -95 45.8% -0.19 84–94 (47%) 79–102 (44%) 95.5 -0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.