H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Jerome Golmard vs Jonas Bjorkman H2H: 1-1
Jerome Golmard and Jonas Bjorkman are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jonas Bjorkman leads 1–0 on grass, while Jerome Golmard leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jerome Golmard won the 2002 Auckland quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 54
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2002* | Auckland | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Jerome Golmard | 6-3 6-4 | Jonas Bjorkman | Match data |
| Jun 20, 1998* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Jonas Bjorkman | 6-3 2-6 6-3 | Jerome Golmard | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerome Golmard | #1,178 | #22 | 1,494 | 1,896 | 141 | 142 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jonas Bjorkman | #685 | #4 | 3,022 | 2,036 | 395 | 341 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jerome Golmard | Jonas Bjorkman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #700 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #333 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #88 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #143 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #50 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #30 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #47 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #69 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #35 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 2,006 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2000 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #50 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #73 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #99 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #44 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #211 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,744 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #54 | 1,677 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #59 | 1,658 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #172 | 1,652 | 0 | 6 |