H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jerome Golmard vs Julien Boutter H2H: 1-2
Julien Boutter holds a 2–1 lead over Jerome Golmard in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Julien Boutter leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jerome Golmard won the 2001 Moscow third round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2001* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jerome Golmard | 7-5 6-3 | Julien Boutter | Match data |
| Feb 1, 2001* | Milan | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Julien Boutter | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Jerome Golmard | Match data |
| Sep 16, 2000* | Tashkent | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Julien Boutter | 6-1 1-1 (ret.) | Jerome Golmard | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerome Golmard | #1,178 | #22 | 1,494 | 1,896 | 141 | 142 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Julien Boutter | #1,092 | #46 | 790 | 1,817 | 62 | 84 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jerome Golmard | Julien Boutter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #88 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #143 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1997 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #47 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #276 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #35 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #133 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #50 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #99 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #110 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #211 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #597 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |