H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jerome Golmard vs Justin Gimelstob H2H: 1-0
Jerome Golmard holds a 1–0 lead over Justin Gimelstob in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jerome Golmard leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jerome Golmard won the 1999 Nottingham third round 6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 1999* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Jerome Golmard | 6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(5) | Justin Gimelstob | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerome Golmard | #1,178 | #22 | 1,494 | 1,896 | 141 | 142 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Justin Gimelstob | #841 | #63 | 733 | 1,721 | 107 | 171 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jerome Golmard | Justin Gimelstob | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #104 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #88 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #143 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #82 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #97 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #47 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #35 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #106 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #50 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #162 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #99 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #104 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #211 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #556 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |