H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 07:16 UTC

Jerome Golmard vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 0-1

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 1–0 lead over Jerome Golmard in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lleyton Hewitt leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 1999 Scottsdale quarterfinal 6-1 3-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jerome Golmard
FRA Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 6, 1999* Scottsdale ATP 250 QF Hard Lleyton Hewitt #91 6-1 3-0 (ret.) Jerome Golmard #36 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jerome Golmard #1,178 #22 1,494 1,896 141 142 49.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jerome Golmard Lleyton Hewitt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2
19 — — — — — — — 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6
20 1994 1–1 50.0% #208 1,514 0 0 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12
21 1995 6–11 35.3% #88 1,549 0 0 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17
22 1996 3–14 17.6% #143 1,423 0 0 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19
23 1997 12–16 42.9% #115 1,548 0 0 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23
24 1998 23–22 51.1% #47 1,716 0 0 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24
25 1999 21–12 63.6% #35 1,828 0 1 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25
26 2000 30–24 55.6% #42 1,755 0 2 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26
27 2001 27–21 56.2% #50 1,746 0 2 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26
28 2002 14–13 51.9% #99 1,699 0 2 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27
29 2003 0–3 0.0% #309 1,628 0 2 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28
30 2004 4–5 44.4% #211 1,662 0 2 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28
31 — — — — — — — 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28
32 — — — — — — — 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28
33 — — — — — — — 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 — — — — — — — 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30
35 — — — — — — — 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30