H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Jerome Golmard vs Magnus Larsson H2H: 1-1

Jerome Golmard and Magnus Larsson are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jerome Golmard leads 1–0 on grass, while Magnus Larsson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magnus Larsson won the 2002 Tokyo fourth round 3-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jerome Golmard
FRA Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Magnus Larsson
SWE Age 56 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 4, 2002* Tokyo ATP 250 R16 Hard Magnus Larsson #174 3-6 6-3 6-4 Jerome Golmard #108 Match data
Jun 18, 1998* Nottingham ATP 250 R32 Grass Jerome Golmard #93 6-2 7-6(4) Magnus Larsson #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jerome Golmard #1,178 #22 1,494 1,896 141 142 49.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Magnus Larsson #1,422 #10 2,222 2,040 293 217 57.5% 0 0 1 0 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jerome Golmard Magnus Larsson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1988 2–2 50.0% #381 1,518 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1989 0–3 0.0% #145 1,469 0 0
20 1994 1–1 50.0% #208 1,514 0 0 1990 15–9 62.5% #56 1,680 0 1
21 1995 6–11 35.3% #88 1,549 0 0 1991 21–21 50.0% #61 1,718 0 1
22 1996 3–14 17.6% #143 1,423 0 0 1992 27–19 58.7% #34 1,802 0 3
23 1997 12–16 42.9% #115 1,548 0 0 1993 29–25 53.7% #39 1,820 0 3
24 1998 23–22 51.1% #47 1,716 0 0 1994 36–21 63.2% #19 2,004 0 6
25 1999 21–12 63.6% #35 1,828 0 1 1995 32–13 71.1% #17 1,932 0 6
26 2000 30–24 55.6% #42 1,755 0 2 1996 26–23 53.1% #46 1,765 0 6
27 2001 27–21 56.2% #50 1,746 0 2 1997 38–21 64.4% #25 1,891 0 6
28 2002 14–13 51.9% #99 1,699 0 2 1998 19–16 54.3% #43 1,828 0 6
29 2003 0–3 0.0% #309 1,628 0 2 1999 16–18 47.1% #95 1,729 0 6
30 2004 4–5 44.4% #211 1,662 0 2 2000 13–6 68.4% #75 1,770 0 7
31 — — — — — — — 2001 10–10 50.0% #136 1,728 0 7
32 — — — — — — — 2002 8–8 50.0% #152 1,673 0 7
33 — — — — — — — 2003 1–2 33.3% #507 1,689 0 7