H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jerome Golmard vs Magnus Norman H2H: 3-1
Jerome Golmard holds a 3–1 lead over Magnus Norman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jerome Golmard leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Magnus Norman leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Magnus Norman won the 2000 Estoril third round 7-6(1) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 50
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2000* | Estoril | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Magnus Norman | 7-6(1) 6-1 | Jerome Golmard | Match data |
| Feb 19, 2000* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Jerome Golmard | 6-4 6-3 | Magnus Norman | Match data |
| Mar 17, 1999* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jerome Golmard | 6-4 6-3 | Magnus Norman | Match data |
| Jan 9, 1998* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jerome Golmard | 1-6 6-2 0-1 (ret.) | Magnus Norman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerome Golmard | #1,178 | #22 | 1,494 | 1,896 | 141 | 142 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Magnus Norman | #500 | #2 | 3,610 | 2,041 | 234 | 163 | 58.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jerome Golmard | Magnus Norman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #690 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #88 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 42–26 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #143 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1997 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #47 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #4 | 1,885 | 0 | 12 |
| 25 | 1999 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #35 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #49 | 1,751 | 0 | 12 |
| 26 | 2000 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,673 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #50 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,595 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #99 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #211 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |