H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jerome Golmard vs Mark Knowles H2H: 0-1
Mark Knowles holds a 1–0 lead over Jerome Golmard in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Knowles leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mark Knowles won the 1996 Wimbledon first round 6-2 6-4 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BAH
Age 54
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1996* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Mark Knowles | 6-2 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Jerome Golmard | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerome Golmard | #1,178 | #22 | 1,494 | 1,896 | 141 | 142 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mark Knowles | #1,400 | #96 | 484 | 1,623 | 23 | 51 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jerome Golmard | Mark Knowles | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #430 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #291 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #258 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #88 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #143 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #139 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #47 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #117 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #35 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #363 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #273 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #50 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #99 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #350 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #211 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |