H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jerome Golmard vs Mark Philippoussis H2H: 0-1
Mark Philippoussis holds a 1–0 lead over Jerome Golmard in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Philippoussis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 1997 US Open second round 7-6(5) 6-2 1-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 1997* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Mark Philippoussis | 7-6(5) 6-2 1-0 (ret.) | Jerome Golmard | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerome Golmard | #1,178 | #22 | 1,494 | 1,896 | 141 | 142 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,022 | 287 | 190 | 60.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jerome Golmard | Mark Philippoussis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1995 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #88 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,906 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #143 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1997 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #47 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,803 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1999 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #35 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 2000 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #50 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #109 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #99 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,659 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,732 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #211 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |