Jerome Golmard
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Henman | 3 | 5 | 8 | Sep 3, 2004 | H2H |
| Alex Corretja | 2 | 5 | 7 | Sep 27, 2002 | H2H |
| Karol Kucera | 4 | 1 | 5 | Sep 26, 2002 | H2H |
| Thomas Enqvist | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 4, 2002 | H2H |
| Tommy Haas | 1 | 4 | 5 | Oct 11, 2001 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Jerome Golmard vs Markus Hantschk H2H: 1-0
Jerome Golmard holds a 1–0 lead over Markus Hantschk in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jerome Golmard leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jerome Golmard won the 2000 Chennai final 6-3 6-7(6) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerome Golmard | 6-3 6-7(6) 6-3 | Markus Hantschk | Match data | Jan 9, 2000* | F | Chennai | ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerome Golmard | #1,178 | #22 | 1,494 | 1,884 | 141 | 142 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Markus Hantschk | #1,233 | #71 | 575 | 1,608 | 26 | 41 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jerome Golmard | Markus Hantschk | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #88 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #128 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #143 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #72 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #178 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #47 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1999 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #35 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #177 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #371 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #50 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #99 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #211 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jerome Golmard | Markus Hantschk | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 20 | 1994 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1999 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 8 | 8 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2000 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1997 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2001 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1998 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1999 | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2003 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2000 | 23 | 13 | 36 | 63.9% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2004 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2001 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 16 | 8 | 24 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 14 | 9 | 23 | 60.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 85 | 70 | 155 | 54.8% | 32 | 40 | 72 | 44.4% | 15 | 17 | 32 | 46.9% | 9 | 15 | 24 | 37.5% | — | 9 | 18 | 27 | 33.3% | 16 | 20 | 36 | 44.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 242/283 of Jerome Golmard's and 60/66 of Markus Hantschk's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jerome Golmard | Markus Hantschk | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | 1994 | 2/2 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 54.9% | 67.2% | 58.0% | 61.1% | 41.7% | 62.7% | 35.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 16/17 | 5.1 | 5.4 | 54.3% | 68.1% | 47.0% | 54.9% | 35.2% | 58.3% | 32.4% | 1999 | 6/6 | 4.2 | 2.2 | 56.8% | 68.3% | 47.3% | 43.3% | 37.7% | 59.3% | 35.8% |
| 22 | 1996 | 12/17 | 3.9 | 5.4 | 58.8% | 67.5% | 39.3% | 43.9% | 25.7% | 55.9% | 30.3% | 2000 | 37/40 | 3.9 | 2.3 | 57.2% | 68.1% | 50.5% | 59.5% | 44.6% | 60.6% | 36.8% |
| 23 | 1997 | 23/28 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 57.9% | 69.5% | 50.8% | 54.4% | 41.0% | 61.4% | 33.5% | 2001 | 13/16 | 5.2 | 2.5 | 55.4% | 67.5% | 47.2% | 47.6% | 29.1% | 57.9% | 32.1% |
| 24 | 1998 | 40/45 | 5.1 | 4.1 | 62.3% | 69.2% | 51.2% | 63.2% | 44.9% | 62.2% | 36.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1999 | 29/33 | 5.1 | 2.7 | 57.9% | 72.8% | 53.3% | 54.9% | 44.1% | 64.3% | 37.8% | 2003 | 3/3 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 63.5% | 69.2% | 56.6% | 70.9% | 29.9% | 63.6% | 34.3% |
| 26 | 2000 | 45/54 | 6.4 | 3.4 | 56.6% | 71.0% | 53.7% | 55.3% | 38.7% | 63.2% | 35.2% | 2004 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 63.5% | 57.5% | 39.1% | 50.0% | 40.0% | 50.8% | 36.1% |
| 27 | 2001 | 42/48 | 5.4 | 3.2 | 60.3% | 71.8% | 49.2% | 53.8% | 46.7% | 62.9% | 38.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 21/27 | 6.9 | 4.0 | 61.4% | 77.0% | 51.6% | 51.5% | 35.9% | 66.9% | 38.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 3/3 | 2.7 | 6.7 | 53.2% | 74.7% | 62.6% | 51.2% | 87.5% | 69.1% | 30.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 9/9 | 8.0 | 4.3 | 56.4% | 73.1% | 51.8% | 42.1% | 45.8% | 63.8% | 34.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 242/283 | 5.5 | 3.8 | 58.8% | 71.2% | 50.9% | 54.8% | 41.8% | 62.7% | 35.9% | — | 60/67 | 4.1 | 2.3 | 57.2% | 67.8% | 49.6% | 55.7% | 39.7% | 59.8% | 35.5% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jerome Golmard | Markus Hantschk | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 20 | 1994 | 1514 | 111.9 | +2.11 | -0.88 | 0.946 | 49.6% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.17 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.06 | 1998 | 1488 | 101.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.11 |
| 21 | 1995 | 1550 | 131.8 | -1.50 | -2.68 | 0.777 | 45.9% | +22 | +6 | — | 40.0% | -0.80 | 2–4 (33%) | 6–1 (86%) | — | +0.02 | 1999 | 1490 | 105.6 | -1.57 | -1.98 | 0.879 | 47.4% | — | +40 | — | 41.2% | -0.71 | 1–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.41 |
| 22 | 1996 | 1425 | 100.2 | -4.28 | -4.47 | 0.687 | 44.2% | +138 | +11 | — | 29.5% | -1.25 | 1–5 (17%) | 0–1 | — | +1.31 | 2000 | 1556 | 116.3 | -1.51 | -1.02 | 0.932 | 49.0% | -54 | +84 | -29 | 44.8% | -0.21 | 12–6 (67%) | 7–9 (44%) | — | +2.72 |
| 23 | 1997 | 1547 | 122.9 | -0.42 | -3.18 | 0.869 | 47.8% | +25 | -86 | +102 | 46.4% | -0.23 | 5–4 (56%) | 4–6 (40%) | — | +0.72 | 2001 | 1463 | 101.8 | -2.49 | -3.28 | 0.762 | 45.0% | +13 | +79 | — | 25.0% | -1.78 | 2–1 (67%) | 3–3 (50%) | — | +1.12 |
| 24 | 1998 | 1718 | 137.1 | +0.32 | -1.03 | 0.965 | 49.6% | -39 | -228 | +12 | 54.7% | +0.22 | 6–8 (43%) | 9–9 (50%) | — | -1.08 | 2002 | 1474 | 101.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1999 | 1843 | 150.8 | +3.05 | +0.79 | 1.059 | 50.9% | -30 | -209 | — | 64.2% | +0.94 | 5–3 (63%) | 9–6 (60%) | — | -1.75 | 2003 | 1495 | 112.1 | +0.56 | -0.47 | 0.943 | 50.2% | — | — | — | 42.9% | -0.29 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.20 |
| 26 | 2000 | 1757 | 145.2 | +0.97 | -1.36 | 0.957 | 49.3% | +32 | -125 | -46 | 55.6% | +0.36 | 9–5 (64%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | -0.62 | 2004 | 1482 | 100.6 | +2.07 | +2.13 | 0.733 | 43.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.15 |
| 27 | 2001 | 1747 | 137.2 | +1.00 | +0.19 | 1.035 | 50.7% | +8 | -18 | -101 | 57.7% | +0.57 | 7–7 (50%) | 7–12 (37%) | — | +0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 1700 | 136.6 | +2.40 | +0.61 | 1.153 | 52.2% | +64 | — | — | 56.1% | +0.12 | 2–5 (29%) | 8–2 (80%) | — | +0.65 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 1628 | 97.6 | +2.49 | -4.05 | 0.991 | 45.5% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -2.50 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 1661 | 113.6 | -0.53 | -2.50 | 0.955 | 49.2% | +96 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.40 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.70 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 1610 | 91.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1885 | 140.8 | +0.66 | -1.09 | 0.961 | 49.4% | +20 | -84 | +6 | 52.5% | +0.11 | 39–44 (47%) | 56–47 (54%) | 104.6 | +0.05 | — | 1608 | 111.8 | -1.57 | -1.53 | 0.885 | 47.9% | -25 | +76 | -29 | 39.1% | -0.65 | 15–9 (63%) | 12–16 (43%) | 107.8 | +5.99 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Markus Hantschk
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Zib | 2 | 1 | 3 | Feb 21, 2001 | H2H |
| Alex Calatrava | 1 | 2 | 3 | Nov 10, 2000 | H2H |
| Lleyton Hewitt | 0 | 2 | 2 | May 14, 2003 | H2H |
| Fernando Vicente | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jan 3, 2003 | H2H |
| Hicham Arazi | 0 | 2 | 2 | Feb 15, 2001 | H2H |