H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Jerome Golmard vs Martin Damm Sr H2H: 1-1

Jerome Golmard and Martin Damm Sr are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jerome Golmard won the 2000 Chennai semifinal 3-6 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jerome Golmard
FRA Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Martin Damm Sr
CZE

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jerome Golmard #35 3-6 6-3 6-3 Martin Damm Sr Match data Jan 8, 2000* SF Chennai ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Martin Damm Sr 6-1 6-1 Jerome Golmard #120 Match data Aug 13, 1997* R64 Indianapolis Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jerome Golmard #1,178 #22 1,494 1,884 141 142 49.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Martin Damm Sr — — — 1,731 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Jerome Golmard Martin Damm Sr
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1994 1–1 50.0% #208 1,514 0 0 — — — — — — —
1995 6–11 35.3% #88 1,549 0 0 — — — — — — —
1996 3–14 17.6% #143 1,424 0 0 — — — — — — —
1997 12–16 42.9% #115 1,547 0 0 — — — — — — —
1998 23–22 51.1% #47 1,717 0 0 — — — — — — —
1999 21–12 63.6% #35 1,842 0 1 — — — — — — —
2000 30–24 55.6% #42 1,756 0 2 — — — — — — —
2001 27–21 56.2% #50 1,746 0 2 — — — — — — —
2002 14–13 51.9% #99 1,699 0 2 — — — — — — —
2003 0–3 0.0% #309 1,628 0 2 — — — — — — —
2004 4–5 44.4% #211 1,660 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Jerome Golmard Martin Damm Sr
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1994 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1995 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1996 2 2 4 50.0% 0 8 8 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1991 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
1997 5 9 14 35.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1992 6 8 14 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1998 11 11 22 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1993 7 11 18 38.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
1999 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 7 12 19 36.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
2000 23 13 36 63.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1995 7 13 20 35.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
2001 9 9 18 50.0% 16 8 24 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1996 15 13 28 53.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5%
2002 14 9 23 60.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1997 10 13 23 43.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
2003 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 10 14 24 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
2004 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1999 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 85 70 155 54.8% 32 40 72 44.4% 15 17 32 46.9% 9 15 24 37.5% Career 74 107 181 40.9% 6 28 34 17.6% 22 24 46 47.8% 51 49 100 51.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Jerome Golmard Martin Damm Sr
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1994 1514 111.9 +2.11 -0.88 0.946 49.6% — — — 50.0% +0.17 1–1 1–1 — -0.06 1989 1492 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.08
1995 1550 131.8 -1.50 -2.68 0.777 45.9% +22 +6 — 40.0% -0.80 2–4 (33%) 6–1 (86%) 102.9 +0.02 1990 1478 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.15
1996 1425 100.2 -4.28 -4.47 0.687 44.2% +138 +11 — 29.5% -1.25 1–5 (17%) 0–1 — +1.31 1991 1504 104.7 — — — — +57 — — 57.1% +0.57 1–0 0–1 — +0.21
1997 1547 122.9 -0.42 -3.18 0.869 47.8% +25 -86 +102 46.4% -0.23 5–4 (56%) 4–6 (40%) 102.1 +0.72 1992 1546 125.4 — — — — +65 -88 — 35.1% -0.91 4–1 (80%) 2–5 (29%) 103.3 +0.26
1998 1718 137.1 +0.32 -1.03 0.965 49.6% -39 -228 +12 54.7% +0.22 6–8 (43%) 9–9 (50%) 102.9 -1.08 1993 1647 128.4 — — — — +28 -196 — 44.8% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 +0.61
1999 1843 150.8 +3.05 +0.79 1.059 50.9% -30 -209 — 64.2% +0.94 5–3 (63%) 9–6 (60%) 108.3 -1.75 1994 1630 133.5 — — — — -23 -172 +21 44.4% -0.32 3–13 (19%) 9–10 (47%) 92.4 -0.61
2000 1757 145.2 +0.97 -1.36 0.957 49.3% +32 -125 -46 55.6% +0.36 9–5 (64%) 9–8 (53%) 102.7 -0.62 1995 1619 133.0 — — — — +8 — — 42.3% -0.55 9–8 (53%) 11–11 (50%) 102.9 -0.27
2001 1747 137.2 +1.00 +0.19 1.035 50.7% +8 -18 -101 57.7% +0.57 7–7 (50%) 7–12 (37%) 95.5 +0.06 1996 1709 139.5 — — — — +35 — -23 47.9% -0.08 13–8 (62%) 13–18 (42%) 102.9 +1.26
2002 1700 136.6 +2.40 +0.61 1.153 52.2% +64 — — 56.1% +0.12 2–5 (29%) 8–2 (80%) 99.6 +0.65 1997 1694 135.4 — — — — +35 -281 +7 48.3% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 16–10 (62%) 105.2 +0.62
2003 1628 97.6 +2.49 -4.05 0.991 45.5% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.20 1998 1649 132.2 — — — — +16 — +23 42.9% -0.50 7–7 (50%) 8–11 (42%) 98.6 -0.31
2004 1661 113.6 -0.53 -2.50 0.955 49.2% +96 — — 50.0% -0.40 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.9 +0.70 1999 1578 123.5 — — — — +27 -177 +52 39.1% -0.78 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) 90.9 -0.57
2005 1610 91.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1615 127.5 — — — — -72 -159 +102 44.2% -0.34 7–3 (70%) 6–9 (40%) 105.2 +0.30
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1514 96.3 — — — — — — +91 15.0% -1.90 — 0–2 — +0.77
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1525 111.4 — — — — +15 — — 37.5% -0.75 — 1–1 — -0.13
Career 1885 140.8 +0.66 -1.09 0.961 49.4% +20 -84 +6 52.5% +0.11 39–44 (47%) 56–47 (54%) 104.6 +0.05 Career 1732 136.6 — — — — +17 -170 +36 43.3% -0.43 59–60 (50%) 77–88 (47%) 101.6 +0.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.