H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Jerome Golmard vs Michael Chang H2H: 1-2
Michael Chang holds a 2–1 lead over Jerome Golmard in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jerome Golmard won the 2002 Washington third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 54
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2002* | Washington | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jerome Golmard | 7-5 6-4 | Michael Chang | Match data |
| Jun 23, 2000* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Michael Chang | 1-6 6-4 6-3 | Jerome Golmard | Match data |
| May 30, 1997* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Michael Chang | 6-2 6-3 3-6 6-2 | Jerome Golmard | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerome Golmard | #1,178 | #22 | 1,494 | 1,896 | 141 | 142 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Michael Chang | #1,039 | #2 | 4,065 | 2,110 | 648 | 303 | 68.1% | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 34 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jerome Golmard | Michael Chang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #5 | 1,971 | 1 | 3 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,917 | 1 | 4 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #15 | 2,002 | 1 | 5 |
| 20 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #6 | 1,975 | 1 | 8 |
| 21 | 1995 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #88 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 62–21 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,992 | 1 | 13 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #143 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 66–19 | 77.6% | #6 | 2,005 | 1 | 19 |
| 23 | 1997 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,008 | 1 | 23 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #47 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 63–19 | 76.8% | #2 | 1,985 | 1 | 26 |
| 25 | 1999 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #35 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 53–18 | 74.6% | #3 | 1,910 | 1 | 31 |
| 26 | 2000 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #29 | 1,838 | 1 | 33 |
| 27 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #50 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #50 | 1,788 | 1 | 33 |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #99 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 42–25 | 62.7% | #32 | 1,818 | 1 | 34 |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #94 | 1,701 | 1 | 34 |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #211 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #124 | 1,625 | 1 | 34 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #383 | 1,551 | 1 | 34 |