H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Jerome Golmard vs Nicolas Escude H2H: 2-1
Jerome Golmard holds a 2–1 lead over Nicolas Escude in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Escude leads 1–0 on clay, while Jerome Golmard leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jerome Golmard won the 1998 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-2 6-7(2) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 1998* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jerome Golmard | 6-2 6-7(2) 6-3 | Nicolas Escude | Match data |
| Jun 26, 1998* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Jerome Golmard | 6-3 6-4 4-6 7-6(6) | Nicolas Escude | Match data |
| May 27, 1998* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Nicolas Escude | 6-1 6-2 6-0 | Jerome Golmard | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerome Golmard | #1,178 | #22 | 1,494 | 1,896 | 141 | 142 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Nicolas Escude | #1,071 | #17 | 1,357 | 1,909 | 157 | 124 | 55.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jerome Golmard | Nicolas Escude | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #670 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #88 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #143 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #37 | 1,820 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #47 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #35 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2000 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #34 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #50 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #114 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #99 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #64 | 1,829 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #211 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |