H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Jerome Golmard vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 1-4

Nicolas Kiefer holds a 4–1 lead over Jerome Golmard in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Kiefer leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nicolas Kiefer won the 2001 Moscow fourth round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jerome Golmard
FRA Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Nicolas Kiefer
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 5, 2001* Moscow ATP 250 R16 Carpet Nicolas Kiefer #39 6-4 6-3 Jerome Golmard #47 Match data
Jun 15, 2000* Halle ATP 250 R32 Grass Nicolas Kiefer #13 6-1 6-4 Jerome Golmard #66 Match data
Feb 12, 2000* Dubai ATP 250 QF Hard Nicolas Kiefer #4 6-3 7-6(2) Jerome Golmard #33 Match data
Feb 14, 1999* Dubai ATP 250 F Hard Jerome Golmard #61 6-4 6-2 Nicolas Kiefer #39 Match data
Jan 25, 1998* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Nicolas Kiefer #29 7-5 4-0 (ret.) Jerome Golmard #101 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jerome Golmard #1,178 #22 1,494 1,896 141 142 49.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,984 343 252 57.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jerome Golmard Nicolas Kiefer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #1198 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,562 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,798 0 1
20 1994 1–1 50.0% #208 1,514 0 0 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,790 0 1
21 1995 6–11 35.3% #88 1,549 0 0 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,921 0 4
22 1996 3–14 17.6% #143 1,423 0 0 2000 30–15 66.7% #20 1,921 0 6
23 1997 12–16 42.9% #115 1,548 0 0 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,766 0 6
24 1998 23–22 51.1% #47 1,716 0 0 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,718 0 6
25 1999 21–12 63.6% #35 1,828 0 1 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6
26 2000 30–24 55.6% #42 1,755 0 2 2004 32–19 62.7% #21 1,897 0 6
27 2001 27–21 56.2% #50 1,746 0 2 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,854 0 6
28 2002 14–13 51.9% #99 1,699 0 2 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,843 0 6
29 2003 0–3 0.0% #309 1,628 0 2 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,893 0 6
30 2004 4–5 44.4% #211 1,662 0 2 2008 20–16 55.6% #38 1,876 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,757 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,717 0 6