H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Jerome Golmard vs O. Mutis H2H: 0-1
O. Mutis holds a 1–0 lead over Jerome Golmard in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, O. Mutis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, O. Mutis won the 2003 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-7(5) 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 48
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2003* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | O. Mutis | 6-2 6-7(5) 6-2 6-3 | Jerome Golmard | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerome Golmard | #1,178 | #22 | 1,494 | 1,896 | 141 | 142 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| O. Mutis | #948 | #71 | 572 | 1,628 | 24 | 41 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jerome Golmard | O. Mutis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #680 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #499 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #259 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #88 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #143 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1997 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #284 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #47 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #94 | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #35 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #104 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #108 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #50 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #572 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #99 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #211 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |