H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jerome Golmard vs Sjeng Schalken H2H: 0-4

Sjeng Schalken holds a 4–0 lead over Jerome Golmard in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Sjeng Schalken leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2002 S Hertogenbosch third round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jerome Golmard
FRA Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Sjeng Schalken
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 20, 2002* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 R32 Grass Sjeng Schalken #31 6-4 6-4 Jerome Golmard #65 Match data
Aug 18, 2001* Washington ATP 250 QF Hard Sjeng Schalken #33 4-6 6-4 6-2 Jerome Golmard #48 Match data
Apr 21, 2001* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Sjeng Schalken #30 3-6 6-0 6-1 Jerome Golmard #63 Match data
Jun 10, 1999* Halle ATP 250 R32 Grass Sjeng Schalken #53 7-5 6-0 Jerome Golmard #23 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jerome Golmard #1,178 #22 1,494 1,896 141 142 49.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,934 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jerome Golmard Sjeng Schalken
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2
20 1994 1–1 50.0% #208 1,514 0 0 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,632 0 3
21 1995 6–11 35.3% #88 1,549 0 0 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,592 0 3
22 1996 3–14 17.6% #143 1,423 0 0 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4
23 1997 12–16 42.9% #115 1,548 0 0 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,824 0 5
24 1998 23–22 51.1% #47 1,716 0 0 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,846 0 6
25 1999 21–12 63.6% #35 1,828 0 1 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7
26 2000 30–24 55.6% #42 1,755 0 2 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,826 0 9
27 2001 27–21 56.2% #50 1,746 0 2 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9
28 2002 14–13 51.9% #99 1,699 0 2 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,664 0 9
29 2003 0–3 0.0% #309 1,628 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2004 4–5 44.4% #211 1,662 0 2 — — — — — — —