H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jerome Golmard vs Thierry Champion H2H: 1-1
Jerome Golmard and Thierry Champion are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jerome Golmard leads 1–0 on carpet, while Thierry Champion leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jerome Golmard won the 1997 Shanghai fourth round 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 59
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 1997* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Jerome Golmard | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Thierry Champion | Match data |
| Apr 13, 1995* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Thierry Champion | 6-4 6-3 | Jerome Golmard | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerome Golmard | #1,178 | #22 | 1,494 | 1,896 | 141 | 142 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Thierry Champion | #790 | #44 | 744 | 1,757 | 102 | 162 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jerome Golmard | Thierry Champion | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #463 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #128 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #105 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #88 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #125 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #143 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #404 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #59 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #47 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #48 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #35 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #98 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #209 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #50 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #266 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #99 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #191 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #109 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #211 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #279 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |