H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Jerome Golmard vs Tim Henman H2H: 3-5

Tim Henman holds a 5–3 lead over Jerome Golmard in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts, while Tim Henman leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2004 US Open second round 6-2 6-4 4-6 7-6(1).

FRA Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 5
8 main draw meetings
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 3, 2004* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Tim Henman #6 6-2 6-4 4-6 7-6(1) Jerome Golmard #339 Match data
May 18, 2000* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Tim Henman #12 2-6 6-4 6-1 Jerome Golmard #88 Match data
Jan 19, 2000* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Tim Henman #13 6-7(3) 6-3 7-6(4) 7-6(7) Jerome Golmard #31 Match data
Mar 18, 1999* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Jerome Golmard #32 6-4 7-6(7) Tim Henman #6 Match data
Feb 13, 1999* Dubai ATP 250 QF Hard Jerome Golmard #61 7-6(4) 7-5 Tim Henman #8 Match data
Apr 17, 1998* Tokyo ATP 250 R16 Hard Tim Henman #15 6-4 6-1 Jerome Golmard #85 Match data
Jan 21, 1998* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Jerome Golmard #101 6-3 6-7(3) 6-2 3-6 11-9 Tim Henman #18 Match data
Jun 27, 1997* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Tim Henman #20 7-6(4) 6-3 6-3 Jerome Golmard #94 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jerome Golmard #1,178 #22 1,494 1,896 141 142 49.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jerome Golmard Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 1994 1–1 50.0% #208 1,514 0 0 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0
21 1995 6–11 35.3% #88 1,549 0 0 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0
22 1996 3–14 17.6% #143 1,423 0 0 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 1997 12–16 42.9% #115 1,548 0 0 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 1998 23–22 51.1% #47 1,716 0 0 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4
25 1999 21–12 63.6% #35 1,828 0 1 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6
26 2000 30–24 55.6% #42 1,755 0 2 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8
27 2001 27–21 56.2% #50 1,746 0 2 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9
28 2002 14–13 51.9% #99 1,699 0 2 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11
29 2003 0–3 0.0% #309 1,628 0 2 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11
30 2004 4–5 44.4% #211 1,662 0 2 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11