H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jerome Golmard vs Tim Henman H2H: 3-5

Tim Henman holds a 5–3 lead over Jerome Golmard in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts, while Tim Henman leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2004 US Open round of 64 6-2 6-4 4-6 7-6(1).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jerome Golmard
FRA Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 5
8 main draw meetings
Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tim Henman #6 6-2 6-4 4-6 7-6(1) Jerome Golmard #339 Match data Sep 3, 2004* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Tim Henman #12 2-6 6-4 6-1 Jerome Golmard #88 Match data May 18, 2000* R32 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay
Tim Henman #13 6-7(3) 6-3 7-6(4) 7-6(7) Jerome Golmard #31 Match data Jan 19, 2000* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Jerome Golmard #32 6-4 7-6(7) Tim Henman #6 Match data Mar 18, 1999* R32 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Jerome Golmard #61 7-6(4) 7-5 Tim Henman #8 Match data Feb 13, 1999* QF Dubai Tennis Championships ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Tim Henman #15 6-4 6-1 Jerome Golmard #85 Match data Apr 17, 1998* R16 Japan Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Jerome Golmard #101 6-3 6-7(3) 6-2 3-6 11-9 Tim Henman #18 Match data Jan 21, 1998* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Tim Henman #20 7-6(4) 6-3 6-3 Jerome Golmard #94 Match data Jun 27, 1997* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jerome Golmard #1,178 #22 1,494 1,884 141 142 49.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jerome Golmard Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 1994 1–1 50.0% #208 1,514 0 0 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0
21 1995 6–11 35.3% #88 1,549 0 0 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0
22 1996 3–14 17.6% #143 1,424 0 0 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 1997 12–16 42.9% #115 1,547 0 0 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 1998 23–22 51.1% #47 1,717 0 0 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4
25 1999 21–12 63.6% #35 1,842 0 1 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6
26 2000 30–24 55.6% #42 1,756 0 2 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8
27 2001 27–21 56.2% #50 1,746 0 2 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9
28 2002 14–13 51.9% #99 1,699 0 2 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11
29 2003 0–3 0.0% #309 1,628 0 2 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11
30 2004 4–5 44.4% #211 1,660 0 2 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jerome Golmard Tim Henman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
20 1994 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1995 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4%
22 1996 2 2 4 50.0% 0 8 8 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7%
23 1997 5 9 14 35.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 1998 11 11 22 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2%
25 1999 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 2000 23 13 36 63.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3%
27 2001 9 9 18 50.0% 16 8 24 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2002 14 9 23 60.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9%
29 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 2004 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
Career — 85 70 155 54.8% 32 40 72 44.4% 15 17 32 46.9% 9 15 24 37.5% — 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 242/283 of Jerome Golmard's and 644/732 of Tim Henman's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jerome Golmard Tim Henman
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4%
20 1994 2/2 3.0 3.5 54.9% 67.2% 58.0% 61.1% 41.7% 62.7% 35.3% 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7%
21 1995 16/17 5.1 5.4 54.3% 68.1% 47.0% 54.9% 35.2% 58.3% 32.4% 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7%
22 1996 12/17 3.9 5.4 58.8% 67.5% 39.3% 43.9% 25.7% 55.9% 30.3% 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3%
23 1997 23/28 4.1 4.0 57.9% 69.5% 50.8% 54.4% 41.0% 61.4% 33.5% 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3%
24 1998 40/45 5.1 4.1 62.3% 69.2% 51.2% 63.2% 44.9% 62.2% 36.4% 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2%
25 1999 29/33 5.1 2.7 57.9% 72.8% 53.3% 54.9% 44.1% 64.3% 37.8% 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2%
26 2000 45/54 6.4 3.4 56.6% 71.0% 53.7% 55.3% 38.7% 63.2% 35.2% 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8%
27 2001 42/48 5.4 3.2 60.3% 71.8% 49.2% 53.8% 46.7% 62.9% 38.4% 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8%
28 2002 21/27 6.9 4.0 61.4% 77.0% 51.6% 51.5% 35.9% 66.9% 38.2% 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5%
29 2003 3/3 2.7 6.7 53.2% 74.7% 62.6% 51.2% 87.5% 69.1% 30.6% 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1%
30 2004 9/9 8.0 4.3 56.4% 73.1% 51.8% 42.1% 45.8% 63.8% 34.6% 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5%
Career — 242/283 5.5 3.8 58.8% 71.2% 50.9% 54.8% 41.8% 62.7% 35.9% — 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jerome Golmard Tim Henman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 — +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.33
20 1994 1514 111.9 +2.11 -0.88 0.946 49.6% — — — 50.0% +0.17 1–1 1–1 — -0.06 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 — +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.04
21 1995 1550 131.8 -1.50 -2.68 0.777 45.9% +22 +6 — 40.0% -0.80 2–4 (33%) 6–1 (86%) — +0.02 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 — -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) — -0.81
22 1996 1425 100.2 -4.28 -4.47 0.687 44.2% +138 +11 — 29.5% -1.25 1–5 (17%) 0–1 — +1.31 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) — +0.85
23 1997 1547 122.9 -0.42 -3.18 0.869 47.8% +25 -86 +102 46.4% -0.23 5–4 (56%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.72 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.62
24 1998 1718 137.1 +0.32 -1.03 0.965 49.6% -39 -228 +12 54.7% +0.22 6–8 (43%) 9–9 (50%) — -1.08 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) — +0.72
25 1999 1843 150.8 +3.05 +0.79 1.059 50.9% -30 -209 — 64.2% +0.94 5–3 (63%) 9–6 (60%) — -1.75 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.25
26 2000 1757 145.2 +0.97 -1.36 0.957 49.3% +32 -125 -46 55.6% +0.36 9–5 (64%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.62 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) — +2.30
27 2001 1747 137.2 +1.00 +0.19 1.035 50.7% +8 -18 -101 57.7% +0.57 7–7 (50%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.06 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — +0.21
28 2002 1700 136.6 +2.40 +0.61 1.153 52.2% +64 — — 56.1% +0.12 2–5 (29%) 8–2 (80%) — +0.65 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.72
29 2003 1628 97.6 +2.49 -4.05 0.991 45.5% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.20 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) — +0.11
30 2004 1661 113.6 -0.53 -2.50 0.955 49.2% +96 — — 50.0% -0.40 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.70 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.77
31 2005 1610 91.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.94
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.06
Career — 1885 140.8 +0.66 -1.09 0.961 49.4% +20 -84 +6 52.5% +0.11 39–44 (47%) 56–47 (54%) 104.6 +0.05 — 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.