H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jerome Golmard vs Tommy Haas H2H: 1-4

Tommy Haas holds a 4–1 lead over Jerome Golmard in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2001 Vienna Open round of 32 3-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jerome Golmard
FRA Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tommy Haas #16 3-0 (ret.) Jerome Golmard #49 Match data Oct 11, 2001* R32 Vienna Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Jerome Golmard #48 6-4 6-4 Tommy Haas #15 Match data Aug 17, 2001* R16 Washington Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Tommy Haas #24 6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(5) Jerome Golmard #48 Match data Aug 4, 2001* R16 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
Tommy Haas #22 6-0 6-1 6-1 Jerome Golmard #50 Match data May 30, 2001* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Tommy Haas #28 2-6 6-3 6-1 Jerome Golmard #39 Match data Oct 14, 2000* QF Vienna Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jerome Golmard #1,178 #22 1,494 1,884 141 142 49.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,116 540 333 61.9% 0 1 0 4 10 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jerome Golmard Tommy Haas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,588 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,722 0 0
20 1994 1–1 50.0% #208 1,514 0 0 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,820 0 0
21 1995 6–11 35.3% #88 1,549 0 0 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,833 0 1
22 1996 3–14 17.6% #143 1,424 0 0 2000 32–21 60.4% #23 1,813 0 1
23 1997 12–16 42.9% #115 1,547 0 0 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,011 0 5
24 1998 23–22 51.1% #47 1,717 0 0 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,863 0 5
25 1999 21–12 63.6% #35 1,842 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 2000 30–24 55.6% #42 1,756 0 2 2004 36–19 65.5% #17 1,916 0 7
27 2001 27–21 56.2% #50 1,746 0 2 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,767 0 7
28 2002 14–13 51.9% #99 1,699 0 2 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,892 0 10
29 2003 0–3 0.0% #309 1,628 0 2 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,894 0 11
30 2004 4–5 44.4% #211 1,660 0 2 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,857 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,940 0 12
32 — — — — — — — 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,865 0 12
33 — — — — — — — 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,771 0 12
34 — — — — — — — 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,975 0 13
35 — — — — — — — 2013 47–24 66.2% #12 2,024 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,911 0 15
37 — — — — — — — 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,788 0 15
39 — — — — — — — 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,689 0 15

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jerome Golmard Tommy Haas
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 10 8 18 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1994 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 18 15 33 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
21 1995 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1996 2 2 4 50.0% 0 8 8 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2000 18 9 27 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 1997 5 9 14 35.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2001 41 12 53 77.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0%
24 1998 11 11 22 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2002 25 14 39 64.1% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1999 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2000 23 13 36 63.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2004 24 11 35 68.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2001 9 9 18 50.0% 16 8 24 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2002 14 9 23 60.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 34 10 44 77.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7%
29 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 31 13 44 70.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
30 2004 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 15 14 29 51.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 16 12 28 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 28 15 43 65.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 7 6 13 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
Career — 85 70 155 54.8% 32 40 72 44.4% 15 17 32 46.9% 9 15 24 37.5% — 335 197 532 63.0% 117 82 199 58.8% 57 34 91 62.6% 31 20 51 60.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 242/283 of Jerome Golmard's and 805/873 of Tommy Haas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jerome Golmard Tommy Haas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 7/7 3.7 3.9 53.5% 70.9% 59.6% 71.3% 67.6% 65.3% 36.7%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 36/39 5.5 3.8 59.8% 71.0% 49.5% 55.1% 44.9% 62.5% 38.5%
20 1994 2/2 3.0 3.5 54.9% 67.2% 58.0% 61.1% 41.7% 62.7% 35.3% 1998 51/60 4.9 4.1 58.9% 71.1% 48.0% 55.1% 44.2% 61.3% 39.1%
21 1995 16/17 5.1 5.4 54.3% 68.1% 47.0% 54.9% 35.2% 58.3% 32.4% 1999 54/68 8.4 5.6 53.0% 76.3% 50.6% 62.2% 43.2% 64.2% 35.9%
22 1996 12/17 3.9 5.4 58.8% 67.5% 39.3% 43.9% 25.7% 55.9% 30.3% 2000 39/53 7.0 4.4 54.3% 74.2% 51.0% 59.5% 43.0% 63.5% 35.9%
23 1997 23/28 4.1 4.0 57.9% 69.5% 50.8% 54.4% 41.0% 61.4% 33.5% 2001 62/74 7.7 3.9 56.4% 76.7% 52.4% 64.4% 42.5% 66.0% 39.7%
24 1998 40/45 5.1 4.1 62.3% 69.2% 51.2% 63.2% 44.9% 62.2% 36.4% 2002 58/65 8.8 4.8 56.0% 75.4% 52.7% 61.9% 39.6% 65.5% 37.1%
25 1999 29/33 5.1 2.7 57.9% 72.8% 53.3% 54.9% 44.1% 64.3% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2000 45/54 6.4 3.4 56.6% 71.0% 53.7% 55.3% 38.7% 63.2% 35.2% 2004 53/55 5.9 3.4 57.9% 75.9% 52.0% 57.3% 46.4% 65.7% 39.2%
27 2001 42/48 5.4 3.2 60.3% 71.8% 49.2% 53.8% 46.7% 62.9% 38.4% 2005 49/49 6.7 3.6 57.8% 74.3% 52.7% 52.9% 43.6% 65.2% 37.8%
28 2002 21/27 6.9 4.0 61.4% 77.0% 51.6% 51.5% 35.9% 66.9% 38.2% 2006 67/67 7.1 3.2 61.0% 76.4% 54.5% 60.1% 40.2% 67.9% 38.3%
29 2003 3/3 2.7 6.7 53.2% 74.7% 62.6% 51.2% 87.5% 69.1% 30.6% 2007 52/53 8.0 3.0 60.6% 78.1% 55.6% 61.9% 43.3% 69.0% 38.7%
30 2004 9/9 8.0 4.3 56.4% 73.1% 51.8% 42.1% 45.8% 63.8% 34.6% 2008 32/33 7.3 3.8 59.4% 72.6% 52.0% 62.8% 40.9% 64.3% 38.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 48/49 9.1 4.9 60.2% 77.6% 53.0% 65.4% 44.8% 67.7% 35.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 7/7 9.9 4.6 60.9% 72.3% 50.5% 65.2% 38.4% 63.4% 35.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 19/19 7.8 4.3 59.9% 70.7% 51.7% 60.5% 43.6% 62.9% 34.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 47/48 6.2 3.4 59.6% 75.7% 53.9% 65.6% 43.9% 66.9% 39.1%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 68/71 6.1 3.3 61.3% 74.8% 54.0% 63.0% 41.1% 66.6% 37.8%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 25/25 4.6 2.0 63.7% 72.2% 53.8% 56.5% 49.5% 65.3% 36.9%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 11/11 4.0 4.7 62.5% 70.1% 50.4% 52.3% 31.9% 62.8% 31.0%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 20/20 4.8 4.1 61.9% 68.9% 54.0% 61.4% 29.9% 63.1% 31.7%
Career — 242/283 5.5 3.8 58.8% 71.2% 50.9% 54.8% 41.8% 62.7% 35.9% — 805/873 6.9 3.9 58.7% 74.7% 52.5% 60.6% 42.7% 65.5% 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jerome Golmard Tommy Haas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1588 144.9 +0.04 +2.74 1.057 51.8% +30 — — 58.8% +0.77 0–1 2–0 — -0.78
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1723 139.6 +1.11 +0.51 1.027 50.7% -2 -80 -102 54.9% +0.37 9–8 (53%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.37
20 1994 1514 111.9 +2.11 -0.88 0.946 49.6% — — — 50.0% +0.17 1–1 1–1 — -0.06 1998 1821 150.9 +0.55 +1.94 1.010 50.5% -13 -133 -149 51.4% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.69
21 1995 1550 131.8 -1.50 -2.68 0.777 45.9% +22 +6 — 40.0% -0.80 2–4 (33%) 6–1 (86%) — +0.02 1999 1833 148.8 +1.86 -1.09 1.003 50.2% +21 -62 -115 60.7% +0.62 13–7 (65%) 20–19 (51%) — +0.33
22 1996 1425 100.2 -4.28 -4.47 0.687 44.2% +138 +11 — 29.5% -1.25 1–5 (17%) 0–1 — +1.31 2000 1814 145.1 +1.31 -0.68 0.983 49.9% +30 -33 -96 53.0% +0.31 14–3 (82%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.61
23 1997 1547 122.9 -0.42 -3.18 0.869 47.8% +25 -86 +102 46.4% -0.23 5–4 (56%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.72 2001 2012 160.6 +4.03 +2.88 1.170 52.7% +26 -246 -364 67.6% +1.30 17–3 (85%) 13–18 (42%) — -1.10
24 1998 1718 137.1 +0.32 -1.03 0.965 49.6% -39 -228 +12 54.7% +0.22 6–8 (43%) 9–9 (50%) — -1.08 2002 1863 149.4 +3.04 +0.31 1.074 51.4% +35 +17 — 62.0% +0.66 19–7 (73%) 17–11 (61%) — +1.60
25 1999 1843 150.8 +3.05 +0.79 1.059 50.9% -30 -209 — 64.2% +0.94 5–3 (63%) 9–6 (60%) — -1.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2000 1757 145.2 +0.97 -1.36 0.957 49.3% +32 -125 -46 55.6% +0.36 9–5 (64%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.62 2004 1917 153.9 +3.05 +2.94 1.143 52.4% +36 -67 -248 60.3% +0.68 10–5 (67%) 9–10 (47%) — -2.50
27 2001 1747 137.2 +1.00 +0.19 1.035 50.7% +8 -18 -101 57.7% +0.57 7–7 (50%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.06 2005 1767 138.3 +1.76 +0.90 1.088 51.1% +34 +44 -63 58.6% +0.48 4–8 (33%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.64
28 2002 1700 136.6 +2.40 +0.61 1.153 52.2% +64 — — 56.1% +0.12 2–5 (29%) 8–2 (80%) — +0.65 2006 1892 153.4 +4.99 +1.83 1.194 52.7% +57 -145 -124 69.5% +1.12 13–8 (62%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.81
29 2003 1628 97.6 +2.49 -4.05 0.991 45.5% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.20 2007 1894 152.7 +4.56 +2.83 1.249 53.6% +31 -196 -35 65.2% +1.02 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) — +2.11
30 2004 1661 113.6 -0.53 -2.50 0.955 49.2% +96 — — 50.0% -0.40 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.70 2008 1858 140.5 +1.47 +1.79 1.068 51.1% +30 — +20 54.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.96
31 2005 1610 91.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1941 151.0 +3.54 -0.13 1.093 51.7% -108 -141 +173 61.2% +0.76 10–6 (63%) 15–13 (54%) — -1.53
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1866 115.9 -0.81 -0.45 0.960 49.6% -85 — — 45.5% -0.05 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.43
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1772 128.1 -0.01 -0.99 0.941 48.9% +11 — +215 45.1% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 8–6 (57%) — +1.11
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1975 163.7 +4.25 +2.56 1.182 52.7% -70 -48 +106 61.9% +0.71 7–7 (50%) 11–5 (69%) — -1.93
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2024 167.7 +3.58 +2.30 1.133 52.1% -25 +9 +118 65.3% +0.87 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.12
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1911 147.8 +1.08 +0.76 1.066 51.1% +26 +47 — 58.8% +0.77 7–2 (78%) 5–2 (71%) — +1.30
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1788 121.7 -0.85 -1.47 0.835 47.3% +57 — +212 32.3% -1.23 0–3 (0%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.82
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1689 129.1 -1.47 -2.29 0.859 47.7% +75 +108 +206 36.0% -0.80 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.60
Career — 1885 140.8 +0.66 -1.09 0.961 49.4% +20 -84 +6 52.5% +0.11 39–44 (47%) 56–47 (54%) 104.6 +0.05 — 2117 158.2 +2.62 +1.22 1.087 51.5% +10 -44 +3 59.5% +0.62 170–105 (62%) 198–152 (57%) 109.2 -0.69

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.