H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jerome Golmard vs Tommy Haas H2H: 1-4

Tommy Haas holds a 4–1 lead over Jerome Golmard in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2001 Vienna third round 3-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jerome Golmard
FRA Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 11, 2001* Vienna ATP 250 R32 Hard Tommy Haas #16 3-0 (ret.) Jerome Golmard #49 Match data
Aug 17, 2001* Washington ATP 250 R16 Hard Jerome Golmard #48 6-4 6-4 Tommy Haas #15 Match data
Aug 4, 2001* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Tommy Haas #24 6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(5) Jerome Golmard #48 Match data
May 30, 2001* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Tommy Haas #22 6-0 6-1 6-1 Jerome Golmard #50 Match data
Oct 14, 2000* Vienna ATP 250 QF Hard Tommy Haas #28 2-6 6-3 6-1 Jerome Golmard #39 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jerome Golmard #1,178 #22 1,494 1,896 141 142 49.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jerome Golmard Tommy Haas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0
20 1994 1–1 50.0% #208 1,514 0 0 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0
21 1995 6–11 35.3% #88 1,549 0 0 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1
22 1996 3–14 17.6% #143 1,423 0 0 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1
23 1997 12–16 42.9% #115 1,548 0 0 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5
24 1998 23–22 51.1% #47 1,716 0 0 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5
25 1999 21–12 63.6% #35 1,828 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 2000 30–24 55.6% #42 1,755 0 2 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7
27 2001 27–21 56.2% #50 1,746 0 2 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7
28 2002 14–13 51.9% #99 1,699 0 2 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10
29 2003 0–3 0.0% #309 1,628 0 2 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11
30 2004 4–5 44.4% #211 1,662 0 2 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12
32 — — — — — — — 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12
33 — — — — — — — 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12
34 — — — — — — — 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13
35 — — — — — — — 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 — — — — — — — 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
39 — — — — — — — 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15