H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jerome Golmard vs Wayne Ferreira H2H: 2-2

Jerome Golmard and Wayne Ferreira are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Wayne Ferreira leads 2–0 on carpet, while Jerome Golmard leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wayne Ferreira won the 1999 Rotterdam fourth round 5-7 6-3 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jerome Golmard
FRA Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Wayne Ferreira
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 19, 1999* Rotterdam ATP 250 R16 Carpet Wayne Ferreira #25 5-7 6-3 7-6(4) Jerome Golmard #33 Match data
Mar 6, 1997* Scottsdale ATP 250 R32 Hard Jerome Golmard #125 4-6 6-3 6-2 Wayne Ferreira #9 Match data
Oct 19, 1995* Lyon ATP 250 R32 Carpet Wayne Ferreira #13 5-7 6-2 6-4 Jerome Golmard #101 Match data
Aug 30, 1995* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Jerome Golmard #109 7-5 7-6(5) 6-1 Wayne Ferreira #10 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jerome Golmard #1,178 #22 1,494 1,896 141 142 49.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Wayne Ferreira #1,099 #6 2,701 2,022 483 314 60.6% 0 2 0 0 13 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jerome Golmard Wayne Ferreira
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1990 2–5 28.6% #173 1,529 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1991 26–21 55.3% #41 1,712 0 0
20 1994 1–1 50.0% #208 1,514 0 0 1992 48–24 66.7% #12 1,847 0 2
21 1995 6–11 35.3% #88 1,549 0 0 1993 38–25 60.3% #22 1,819 0 2
22 1996 3–14 17.6% #143 1,423 0 0 1994 66–25 72.5% #12 1,923 0 7
23 1997 12–16 42.9% #115 1,548 0 0 1995 55–25 68.8% #9 1,925 0 11
24 1998 23–22 51.1% #47 1,716 0 0 1996 45–24 65.2% #10 1,838 0 13
25 1999 21–12 63.6% #35 1,828 0 1 1997 26–22 54.2% #42 1,809 0 13
26 2000 30–24 55.6% #42 1,755 0 2 1998 33–24 57.9% #26 1,823 0 13
27 2001 27–21 56.2% #50 1,746 0 2 1999 27–25 51.9% #53 1,704 0 13
28 2002 14–13 51.9% #99 1,699 0 2 2000 41–21 66.1% #13 1,895 0 14
29 2003 0–3 0.0% #309 1,628 0 2 2001 16–21 43.2% #62 1,707 0 14
30 2004 4–5 44.4% #211 1,662 0 2 2002 24–18 57.1% #39 1,811 0 14
31 — — — — — — — 2003 24–19 55.8% #26 1,762 0 15
32 — — — — — — — 2004 12–15 44.4% #128 1,692 0 15