H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Jerome Potier vs Patrik Kuhnen H2H: 0-1

Patrik Kuhnen holds a 1–0 lead over Jerome Potier in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patrik Kuhnen leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Patrik Kuhnen won the 1988 Brussels round of 32 7-6 6-4.

FRA Age 64 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 1
1 main draw meetings
GER Age 60 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patrik Kuhnen #84 7-6 6-4 Jerome Potier #156 Match data Nov 24, 1988* R32 Brussels ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jerome Potier #987 #68 287 1,688 54 92 37.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Patrik Kuhnen #1,341 #43 574 1,789 126 151 45.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jerome Potier Patrik Kuhnen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1980 2–3 40.0% #325 1,523 0 0
18 1981 7–11 38.9% 1,561 0 0
19 1982 5–15 25.0% 1,525 0 0
20 1983 1–2 33.3% #277 1,504 0 0 1986 1–3 25.0% #170 1,508 0 0
21 1987 10–12 45.5% #83 1,582 0 0
22 1985 4–5 44.4% #126 1,560 0 0 1988 16–16 50.0% #61 1,701 0 0
23 1986 1–5 16.7% #339 1,537 0 0 1989 15–12 55.6% #69 1,744 0 0
24 1987 4–3 57.1% #119 1,592 0 0 1990 23–22 51.1% #82 1,675 0 0
25 1988 13–23 36.1% #162 1,530 0 0 1991 21–24 46.7% #86 1,661 0 0
26 1989 10–10 50.0% #68 1,600 0 0 1992 16–23 41.0% #89 1,656 0 0
27 1990 7–15 31.8% #187 1,546 0 0 1993 13–22 37.1% #119 1,631 0 0
28 1994 6–8 42.9% #189 1,633 0 0
29 1995 4–7 36.4% #187 1,614 0 0
30 1996 1–2 33.3% #504 1,609 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jerome Potier Patrik Kuhnen
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1980 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1981 5 4 9 55.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1982 3 5 8 37.5% 2 8 10 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1987 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1985 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1988 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 7 5 12 58.3%
23 1986 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 6 3 9 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 1987 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1990 13 13 26 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
25 1988 2 4 6 33.3% 8 11 19 42.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1991 11 10 21 52.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4%
26 1989 3 4 7 42.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 11 12 23 47.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5%
27 1990 2 2 4 50.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 1993 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
28 1994 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 21 24 45 46.7% 26 46 72 36.1% 2 7 9 22.2% 5 15 20 25.0% 55 64 119 46.2% 17 27 44 38.6% 19 23 42 45.2% 35 37 72 48.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jerome Potier Patrik Kuhnen
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1980 1523 111.7 +41 45.5% -0.73 0–1 1–0 +0.12
18 1981 1561 112.4 +64 -67 -15 36.2% -1.34 5–1 (83%) 1–1 +1.07
19 1982 1526 125.6 +62 -37 31.9% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 0–4 (0%) +0.11
20 1983 1505 101.7 33.3% -0.33 1–1 0–2 +0.53 1986 1508 110.1 +42 33.3% -2.33 0–1 3–0 (100%) -0.37
21 1987 1583 123.1 +5 -20 -85 43.9% -0.12 5–5 (50%) 2–6 (25%) +0.03
22 1985 1561 123.7 +29 -55 45.8% +0.42 1–1 0–2 +0.52 1988 1701 124.9 -76 -125 -46 53.4% +0.05 5–5 (50%) 8–7 (53%) +1.00
23 1986 1537 104.4 +41 -46 15.4% -2.54 -0.19 1989 1745 137.3 -48 -105 -91 51.5% +0.12 6–2 (75%) 6–5 (55%) -0.67
24 1987 1592 121.6 +40 50.0% +0.34 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) +0.11 1990 1675 136.1 +17 +15 -18 48.6% -0.14 7–5 (58%) 11–5 (69%) -0.51
25 1988 1530 122.6 +31 +47 -62 38.7% -0.83 6–7 (46%) 7–6 (54%) +0.79 1991 1662 134.0 +0.64 -0.43 1.013 50.2% +11 -14 +54 50.9% +0.10 3–11 (21%) 3–8 (27%) +0.13
26 1989 1601 131.0 -55 +75 45.5% -0.25 6–3 (67%) 5–5 (50%) -0.06 1992 1657 134.5 +0.21 -2.10 0.908 48.4% +18 +40 43.8% -0.31 4–7 (36%) 9–10 (47%) -0.13
27 1990 1547 117.7 -36 +81 34.7% -0.92 2–3 (40%) 2–6 (25%) -0.03 1993 1632 125.3 -0.07 -2.17 0.909 48.4% +13 -44 +14 42.7% -0.49 5–8 (38%) 8–8 (50%) +0.06
28 1994 1633 115.0 -0.25 -1.36 0.970 48.8% -15 40.5% -0.76 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) +0.57
29 1995 1615 117.6 -0.55 -2.86 0.797 46.5% +14 37.0% -0.70 3–2 (60%) 2–0 +0.15
30 1996 1609 105.0 -0.52 -3.09 0.820 48.5% 28.6% -1.14 1–0 0–1 -0.02
Career 1689 128.4 +23 +29 -44 38.3% -0.72 24–21 (53%) 18–28 (39%) 102.1 +2.05 1789 136.0 +0.15 -1.61 0.935 48.8% -1 -51 -18 46.8% -0.21 41–47 (47%) 54–51 (51%) 103.1 +0.09

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.