H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Jerome Potier vs Paul Annacone H2H: 1-0
Jerome Potier holds a 1–0 lead over Paul Annacone in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jerome Potier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jerome Potier won the 1988 Australian Open first round 3-6 4-6 6-3 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 64
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 1988* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jerome Potier | 3-6 4-6 6-3 7-5 6-4 | Paul Annacone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerome Potier | #987 | #68 | 287 | 1,689 | 54 | 92 | 37.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Paul Annacone | #1,209 | #12 | 430 | 1,966 | 160 | 131 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jerome Potier | Paul Annacone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #325 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #325 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1982 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #116 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #277 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #94 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #13 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1986 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #339 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1987 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #119 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1988 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #162 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1989 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1990 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #187 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #165 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #433 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #813 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 |