H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 14:15 UTC
Jerome Potier vs Tarik Benhabiles H2H: 0-1
Tarik Benhabiles holds a 1–0 lead over Jerome Potier in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tarik Benhabiles leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tarik Benhabiles won the 1990 Umag fourth round 6-2 3-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 64
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 61
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 1990* | Umag | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Tarik Benhabiles | 6-2 3-6 7-6 | Jerome Potier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerome Potier | #987 | #68 | 287 | 1,689 | 54 | 92 | 37.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tarik Benhabiles | #1,262 | #22 | 387 | 1,767 | 69 | 105 | 39.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jerome Potier | Tarik Benhabiles | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #325 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1981 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #325 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #616 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #116 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #71 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #277 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #134 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #339 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #230 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1987 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #119 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #113 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1988 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #162 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #107 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1989 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #177 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1990 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #187 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |