H2H data updated: 2026-07-26 01:16 UTC
Jerzy Janowicz vs Gilles Muller H2H: 0-1
Gilles Muller holds a 1–0 lead over Jerzy Janowicz in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gilles Muller leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gilles Muller won the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Olympics second round 5-7 6-1 7-6(10).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 35
Right-Handed
203 cm / 6'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
LUX
Age 43
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2016* | Rio de Janeiro Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Gilles Muller | 5-7 6-1 7-6(10) | Jerzy Janowicz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerzy Janowicz | #735 | #14 | 2,154 | 1,961 | 80 | 85 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gilles Muller | #966 | #21 | 1,930 | 2,075 | 203 | 201 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jerzy Janowicz | Gilles Muller | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #26 | 1,834 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #69 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #21 | 1,911 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #76 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #43 | 1,849 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #105 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #57 | 1,789 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #95 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #123 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #248 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #54 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,839 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #368 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #47 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,894 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #34 | 1,967 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #25 | 1,942 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #138 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 |